Effectiveness of fast-track pathway for diabetic foot ulcerations

Author:

Meloni MarcoORCID,Lazaro-Martínez Jose Luis,Ahluwalia Raju,Bouillet Benjamin,Izzo Valentina,Di Venanzio Michela,Iacopi Elisabetta,Manu Chris,Garcia-Klepzig José Luis,Sánchez-Ríos Juan Pedro,Lüedemann Claas,De Buruaga Víctor Rodriguez-Saenz,Vouillarmet Julien,Guillaumat Jérôme,Aleandri Anna Rita,Giurato Laura,Edmonds Micheal,Piaggesi Alberto,Van Acker Kristien,Uccioli Luigi

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate the effectiveness of fast-track pathway (FTP) in the management of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) after 2 years of implementation. Methods The study group was composed of patients who referred to a specialized DF centre due to DFUs. Those were divided in two groups: early referral (ER) and late referral (LR) patients. According to FTP, ER were considered patients who referred after 2 weeks in the case of uncomplicated non-healing ulcers (superficial, not infected, not ischemic), within 4 days in the case of complicated ulcers (ischemic, deep, mild infection) and within 24 h in the case of severely complicated ulcers (abscess, wet gangrene, fever). Healing, healing time, minor and major amputation, hospitalization, and survival were evaluated. The follow-up was 6 months. Results Two hundred patients were recruited. The mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 62.5% were male, 91% were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 18 ± 11 years. Within the group, 79.5% had ER while 20.5% had LR. ER patients showed increased rates of healing (89.9 vs. 41.5%, p = 0.001), reduced healing time (10 vs. 16 weeks, p = 0.0002), lower rates of minor (17.6 vs. 75.6%, p < 0.0001) and major amputation (0.6 vs. 36.6%, p < 0.0001), hospitalization (47.1 vs. 82.9%, p = 0.001), and mortality (4.4 vs. 19.5%, p = 0.02) in comparison to LR. At multivariate analysis, ER was an independent predictor of healing, while LR was an independent predictor for minor and major amputation and hospitalization. Conclusion After the FTP implementation, less cases of LR were reported in comparison to ER. ER was an independent predictor of positive outcomes such as healing, healing time, limb salvage, hospitalization, and survival.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Manu C, Lacopi E, Bouillet B, Vouillarmet J, Ahluwalia R, Lüdemann C, Garcia-Klepzig JL, Meloni M, De Buruaga VR, Sánchez-Ríos JP, Edmonds M, Apelqvist J, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Van Acker K (2018) Delayed referral of patients with diabetic foot ulcers across Europe: patterns between primary care and specialised units. J Wound Care 27(3):186–192. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.186

2. Garcia-Klepzig JL, Sánchez-Ríos JP, Manu C, Ahluwalia R, Lüdemann C, Meloni M, Lacopi E, De Buruaga VR, Bouillet B, Vouillarmet J, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Van Acker K (2018) Perception of diabetic foot ulcers among general practitioners in four European countries: knowledge, skills and urgency. J Wound Care 27(5):310–319. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.310

3. Meloni M, Izzo V, Manu C, Ahluwalia R, Pedro J, Sánchez-Ríos CL, Vouillarmet J, Garcia-Klepzig JL, De Buruaga VR, Iacopi E, Bouillet B, Guillaumat Jérôme, Martinez Jose Luis Lazaro, Van Acker Kristien (2019) Fast-track pathway: an easy-to-use tool to reduce delayed referral and amputations in diabetic patients with foot ulceration. Diabet Foot J 22(2):38–47

4. Bus SA, Van Netten JJ, Hinchliffe RJ et al (2020) IWGDF editorial board. Standards for the development and methodology of the 2019 international working group on the diabetic foot guidelines. Diabet Metab Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3267

5. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2006) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.024

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3