Effectiveness of fast-track pathway for diabetic foot ulcerations
-
Published:2021-05-03
Issue:10
Volume:58
Page:1351-1358
-
ISSN:0940-5429
-
Container-title:Acta Diabetologica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Acta Diabetol
Author:
Meloni MarcoORCID, Lazaro-Martínez Jose Luis, Ahluwalia Raju, Bouillet Benjamin, Izzo Valentina, Di Venanzio Michela, Iacopi Elisabetta, Manu Chris, Garcia-Klepzig José Luis, Sánchez-Ríos Juan Pedro, Lüedemann Claas, De Buruaga Víctor Rodriguez-Saenz, Vouillarmet Julien, Guillaumat Jérôme, Aleandri Anna Rita, Giurato Laura, Edmonds Micheal, Piaggesi Alberto, Van Acker Kristien, Uccioli Luigi
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To investigate the effectiveness of fast-track pathway (FTP) in the management of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) after 2 years of implementation.
Methods
The study group was composed of patients who referred to a specialized DF centre due to DFUs. Those were divided in two groups: early referral (ER) and late referral (LR) patients. According to FTP, ER were considered patients who referred after 2 weeks in the case of uncomplicated non-healing ulcers (superficial, not infected, not ischemic), within 4 days in the case of complicated ulcers (ischemic, deep, mild infection) and within 24 h in the case of severely complicated ulcers (abscess, wet gangrene, fever). Healing, healing time, minor and major amputation, hospitalization, and survival were evaluated. The follow-up was 6 months.
Results
Two hundred patients were recruited. The mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 62.5% were male, 91% were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 18 ± 11 years. Within the group, 79.5% had ER while 20.5% had LR. ER patients showed increased rates of healing (89.9 vs. 41.5%, p = 0.001), reduced healing time (10 vs. 16 weeks, p = 0.0002), lower rates of minor (17.6 vs. 75.6%, p < 0.0001) and major amputation (0.6 vs. 36.6%, p < 0.0001), hospitalization (47.1 vs. 82.9%, p = 0.001), and mortality (4.4 vs. 19.5%, p = 0.02) in comparison to LR. At multivariate analysis, ER was an independent predictor of healing, while LR was an independent predictor for minor and major amputation and hospitalization.
Conclusion
After the FTP implementation, less cases of LR were reported in comparison to ER. ER was an independent predictor of positive outcomes such as healing, healing time, limb salvage, hospitalization, and survival.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Manu C, Lacopi E, Bouillet B, Vouillarmet J, Ahluwalia R, Lüdemann C, Garcia-Klepzig JL, Meloni M, De Buruaga VR, Sánchez-Ríos JP, Edmonds M, Apelqvist J, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Van Acker K (2018) Delayed referral of patients with diabetic foot ulcers across Europe: patterns between primary care and specialised units. J Wound Care 27(3):186–192. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.186 2. Garcia-Klepzig JL, Sánchez-Ríos JP, Manu C, Ahluwalia R, Lüdemann C, Meloni M, Lacopi E, De Buruaga VR, Bouillet B, Vouillarmet J, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Van Acker K (2018) Perception of diabetic foot ulcers among general practitioners in four European countries: knowledge, skills and urgency. J Wound Care 27(5):310–319. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.310 3. Meloni M, Izzo V, Manu C, Ahluwalia R, Pedro J, Sánchez-Ríos CL, Vouillarmet J, Garcia-Klepzig JL, De Buruaga VR, Iacopi E, Bouillet B, Guillaumat Jérôme, Martinez Jose Luis Lazaro, Van Acker Kristien (2019) Fast-track pathway: an easy-to-use tool to reduce delayed referral and amputations in diabetic patients with foot ulceration. Diabet Foot J 22(2):38–47 4. Bus SA, Van Netten JJ, Hinchliffe RJ et al (2020) IWGDF editorial board. Standards for the development and methodology of the 2019 international working group on the diabetic foot guidelines. Diabet Metab Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3267 5. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2006) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.024
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|