Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure

Author:

Franceschi Roberto,Pertile Riccardo,Marigliano MarcoORCID,Mozzillo Enza,Maffeis Claudio,Zaffani Silvana,Dusini Carlotta,Antonelli Annalisa,Candia Francesca Di,Maltoni Giulio,Cantarelli Erika,Minuto Nicola,Bassi Marta,Rabbone Ivana,Savastio Silvia,Passanisi Stefano,Lombardo Fortunato,Cherubini Valentino,Saltarelli Maria Alessandra,Tumini Stefano

Abstract

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used. Results 239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach’s coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689–0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the “artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04). Conclusions We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the “AP-acceptance” reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent–young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Verona

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Zeng B, Gao L, Yang Q, Jia H, Sun F (2023) Automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 46(12):2300–2307. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0504

2. Rabbone I, Minuto N, Bonfanti R, Marigliano M, Cerutti F, Cherubini V, d’Annunzio G, Frongia AP, Iafusco D, Ignaccolo G, Lombardo F, Schiaffini R, Toni S, Tumini S, Zucchini S, Pistorio A, Scaramuzza AE, Italian Paediatric Pump Failure Study Group (2017) Insulin pump failures in Italian children with type 1 diabetes: retrospective 1-year cohort study. Diabet Med 34(5):621–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13294. E

3. Franceschi R, Micheli F, Mozzillo E, Cauvin V, Liguori A, Soffiati M, Giani E (2021) Intermittently scanned and continuous glucose monitor systems: a systematic review on psychological outcomes in pediatric patients. Front Pediatr 5:9:660173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.660173

4. Pauley ME, Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP (2021) Barriers to uptake of insulin technologies and novel solutions. Med Devices (Auckl) 12:14:339–354. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S312858

5. Marigliano M, Pertile R, Mozzillo E, Troncone A, Maffeis C, Morotti E, Di Candia F, Fedi L, Iafusco D, Zanfardino A, Cauvin V, Maltoni G, Zucchini S, Cherubini V, Tiberi V, Minuto N, Bassi M, Rabbone I, Savastio S, Tinti D, Tornese G, Schiaffini R, Passanisi S, Lombardo F, Bonfanti R, Scaramuzza A, Franceschi R (2023) Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring is positively correlated with time in range in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 204:110895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110895

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3