Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure
-
Published:2024-08-10
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1432-5233
-
Container-title:Acta Diabetologica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Acta Diabetol
Author:
Franceschi Roberto, Pertile Riccardo, Marigliano MarcoORCID, Mozzillo Enza, Maffeis Claudio, Zaffani Silvana, Dusini Carlotta, Antonelli Annalisa, Candia Francesca Di, Maltoni Giulio, Cantarelli Erika, Minuto Nicola, Bassi Marta, Rabbone Ivana, Savastio Silvia, Passanisi Stefano, Lombardo Fortunato, Cherubini Valentino, Saltarelli Maria Alessandra, Tumini Stefano
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Methods
A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.
Results
239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach’s coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689–0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the “artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the “AP-acceptance” reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent–young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Verona
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Zeng B, Gao L, Yang Q, Jia H, Sun F (2023) Automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 46(12):2300–2307. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0504 2. Rabbone I, Minuto N, Bonfanti R, Marigliano M, Cerutti F, Cherubini V, d’Annunzio G, Frongia AP, Iafusco D, Ignaccolo G, Lombardo F, Schiaffini R, Toni S, Tumini S, Zucchini S, Pistorio A, Scaramuzza AE, Italian Paediatric Pump Failure Study Group (2017) Insulin pump failures in Italian children with type 1 diabetes: retrospective 1-year cohort study. Diabet Med 34(5):621–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13294. E 3. Franceschi R, Micheli F, Mozzillo E, Cauvin V, Liguori A, Soffiati M, Giani E (2021) Intermittently scanned and continuous glucose monitor systems: a systematic review on psychological outcomes in pediatric patients. Front Pediatr 5:9:660173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.660173 4. Pauley ME, Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP (2021) Barriers to uptake of insulin technologies and novel solutions. Med Devices (Auckl) 12:14:339–354. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S312858 5. Marigliano M, Pertile R, Mozzillo E, Troncone A, Maffeis C, Morotti E, Di Candia F, Fedi L, Iafusco D, Zanfardino A, Cauvin V, Maltoni G, Zucchini S, Cherubini V, Tiberi V, Minuto N, Bassi M, Rabbone I, Savastio S, Tinti D, Tornese G, Schiaffini R, Passanisi S, Lombardo F, Bonfanti R, Scaramuzza A, Franceschi R (2023) Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring is positively correlated with time in range in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 204:110895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110895
|
|