Author:
Bak Jessica C. G.,Serné Erik H.,Kramer Mark H. H.,Nieuwdorp Max,Verheugt Carianne L.
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
The global epidemic of diabetes mellitus continues to expand, including its large impact on national health care. Measuring diabetes outcomes and their causes of variation highlights areas for improvement in care and efficiency gains; large registries carry this potential. By means of a systematic review, we aimed to give an overview of national registries worldwide by quantifying their data and assessing their influence on diabetes care.
Methods
The literature on MEDLINE up to March 31, 2020, was searched, using keywords diabetes mellitus, national, registry, registration, and/or database. National disease-specific registries from corresponding articles were included. Database characteristics and clinical variables were obtained. All registries were compared to the ICHOM standard set of outcomes.
Results
We identified 12 national clinical diabetes registries, comprising a total of 7,181,356 diabetic patients worldwide. Nearly all registries recorded weight, HbA1c, lipid profile, and insulin treatment; the recording of other variables varied to a great extent. Overall, registries corresponded fairly well with the ICHOM set. Most registries proved to monitor and improve the quality of diabetes care using guidelines as a benchmark. The effects on national healthcare policy were more variable and often less clear.
Conclusions
National diabetes registries confer clear insights into diagnostics, complications, and treatment. The extent to which registries influenced national healthcare policy was less clear. A globally implemented standard outcome set has the potential to improve concordance between national registries, enhance the comparison and exchange of diabetes outcomes, and allocate resources and interventions where most needed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference86 articles.
1. International Diabetes Federation Europe (2017) Integrating diabetes evidence into practice, p 34. Available from: https://idf.org/our-activities/advocacy-awareness/resources-and-tools/140-integrating-diabetes-evidence-into-practice.html
2. Williams R, Colagiuri SAR (2019) IDF diabetes atlas, pp 34–39. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/2019/IDF_Atlas_9th_Edition_2019.pdf
3. Richardson E, Zaletel J, Nolte E (2016) National diabetes plans in Europe what lessons are there for the prevention and control of chronic diseases in Europe?. Available from: www.nijz.si
4. Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, Ruseckaite R, Romero L, Evans SM (2017) Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0183667–e0183667
5. Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Stroebel RJ et al (2007) Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic—a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 22(12):1740–1744
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献