Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the effects of political pressure groups (lobbies) on transboundary emissions of individual countries and on the stability of international environmental agreements to reduce emissions. We consider two types of lobbies, industry and environmentalists, and we allow for asymmetric countries to consider differences in lobby strengths to study strategic international spillovers of national lobby activities. In our model, lobby groups in countries that are non-signatories to the agreement will impact abatement of the lobby’s home country only. In contrast, lobby activities in signatory countries have spillover effects on the abatement decisions of other member countries. As lobby strength impacts abatement, it will, in turn, impact the incentives to participate in the agreement. We find that lobby activities from both lobby groups, industry and environmentalists, can have the potential to facilitate international cooperation to abate global pollution. This, however, depends on the distribution of lobby activities across countries and on whether green lobby groups have a national or international focus.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference47 articles.
1. Aidt, T. S. (1998). Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics, 69(1), 1–16.
2. Aidt, T. S., & Hwang, U. (2014). To ban or not to ban: Foreign lobbying and cross-national externalities. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 47(1), 272–297.
3. Altamirano-Cabrera, J.-C., Weikard, H.-P., & Haffoudhi, H. (2007). Influence of political pressure groups on the stability of international climate agreements. Working paper NCCR Climate Working Paper 2007-03, University of Bern-EPFL-Paul Scherrer Institute, Bern.
4. Alvarado-Quesada, I., & Weikard, H.-P. (2017). International environmental agreements for biodiversity conservation: A game-theoretic analysis. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(5), 731–754.
5. Anger, N., Asane-Otoo, E., Böhringer, C., & Oberndorfer, U. (2015). Public interest versus interest groups: A political economy analysis of allowance allocation under the EU emissions trading scheme. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(5), 621–638.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献