Safety evaluation of high-risk myocardial micro-biopsy in a swine model
-
Published:2021-11-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0910-8327
-
Container-title:Heart and Vessels
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Heart Vessels
Author:
Chireh ArvinORCID, Sandell Mikael, Grankvist Rikard, Lövljung Victoria, al-Saadi Jonathan, Arnberg Fabian, Lundberg Johan, Settergren Magnus, Holmin Staffan
Abstract
AbstractThe objective of the study was to investigate the safety profile of high-risk micro-endomyocardial biopsy (micro-EMB) compared to conventional EMB in a large animal model. Twenty pigs were subjected to a maximum of 30 consecutive biopsies, including sampling from the free ventricular wall, with either micro-EMB (n = 10) or conventional EMB (n = 10). There were no major complications in the micro-EMB group (0/10), compared to six major complications in the EMB group (6/10; p = 0.003). Survival analysis further highlighted these differences (p = 0.004). There were significantly higher volumes of pericardial effusion in the EMB group (p = 0.01). The study shows a safety advantage of micro-EMB compared to standard EMB in the experimental high-risk circumstances investigated in this animal study. These results indicate enhanced possibilities to collect samples from sensitive areas by using the micro-EMB technique instead of standard EMB.
Funder
familjen erling-perssons stiftelse the söderberg foundations karolinska institutet medtechlabs Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Leone O, Veinot JP, Angelini A, Baandrup UT, Basso C, Berry G, Bruneval P, Burke M, Butany J, Calabrese F, d’Amati G, Edwards WD, Fallon JT, Fishbein MC, Gallagher PJ, Halushka MK, McManus B, Pucci A, Rodriguez ER, Saffitz JE, Sheppard MN, Steenbergen C, Stone JR, Tan C, Thiene G, van der Wal AC, Winters GL (2012) 2011 Consensus statement on endomyocardial biopsy from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol 21:245–274 2. Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, Levine GN, Narula J, Starling RC, Towbin J, Virmani R (2007) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 116:2216–2233 3. Ammirati E, Frigerio M, Adler ED, Basso C, Birnie DH, Brambatti M, Friedrich MG, Klingel K, Lehtonen J, Moslehi JJ, Pedrotti P, Rimoldi OE, Schultheiss H-P, Tschöpe C, Cooper LT, Camici PG (2020) Management of acute myocarditis and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy: an expert consensus document. Circ Heart Fail 13(11):e007405 4. Singh V, Mendirichaga R, Savani GT, Rodriguez A, Blumer V, Elmariah S, Inglessis-Azuaje I, Palacios I (2017) Comparison of utilization trends, indications, and complications of endomyocardial biopsy in native versus donor hearts (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002 to 2014). Am J Cardiol 121(3):356–363 5. Khan T, Selvakumar D, Trivedi S, Rao K, Harapoz M, Thiagalingam A, Denniss AR, Varikatt W (2017) The value of endomyocardial biopsy in diagnosis and guiding therapy. Pathology 49(7):750–756
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|