Author:
Nordström Jonny,Kvernby Sofia,Kero Tanja,Sörensen Jens,Harms Hendrik J.,Lubberink Mark
Abstract
Abstract
Background
15O-water PET is the gold standard for noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow. In addition to evaluation of ischemia, the assessment of cardiac function and remodeling is important in all cardiac diseases. However, since 15O-water is freely diffusible and standard uptake images show little contrast between the myocardium and blood pool, the assessment of left-ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) is challenging. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of calculating LV volumes and EF from first-pass analysis of 15O-water PET, by comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) using a hybrid PET/MR scanner.
Methods
Twenty-four patients with known or suspected CAD underwent a simultaneous ECG-gated cardiac PET/MR scan. The 15O-water first-pass images (0-50 seconds) were analyzed using the CarPET software and the CMR images were analyzed using the software Segment, for LV volumes and EF calculations. The LV volumes and EF were compared using correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, inter- and intra-observer variability of LV volumes and EF were assessed for both modalities.
Results
The correlation between PET and CMR was strong for volumes (r > 0.84) and moderate for EF (r = 0.52), where the moderate correlation for EF was partly due to the small range of EF values. Agreement was high for all parameters, with a slight overestimation of PET values for end-diastolic volume but with no significant mean bias for other parameters. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of volumes was high and comparable between PET and CMR. For EF, inter-observer agreement was higher for PET and intra-observer agreement was higher for CMR.
Conclusion
LV volumes and EF can be calculated by first-pass analysis of a 15O-water PET scan with high accuracy and comparable precision as with CMR.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference32 articles.
1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407‐77.
2. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/ SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2012;126:e354‐471.
3. Driessen RS, Bom MJ, Diemen PA. Incremental prognostic value of hybrid 15H2O positron emission tomography computed tomography: Combining myocardial blood flow, coronary stenosis severity, and high-risk plaque morphology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:1105‐13.
4. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2011;124:2215‐24.
5. Bom MJ, Diemen PA, Driessen RS. Prognostic value of 15H2O positron emission tomography-derived global and regional myocardial perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;2019:1‐10.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献