Author:
Siekkinen Reetta,Kirjavainen Anna K.,Koskensalo Kalle,Smith Nadia A. S.,Fenwick Andrew,Saunavaara Virva,Tolvanen Tuula,Iida Hidehiro,Saraste Antti,Teräs Mika,Teuho Jarmo
Abstract
Abstract
In Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) with Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) systems, accurate quantification is essential. We assessed flow quantification accuracy over various injected activities using a flow phantom.
Methods
The study was performed on the digital 4-ring Discovery MI (DMI-20) and analog Discovery 690 (D690) PET/CT systems, using 325-1257 MBq of [15O]H2O. PET performance and flow quantification accuracy were assessed in terms of count-rates, dead-time factors (DTF), scatter fractions (SF), time-activity curves (TACs), areas-under-the-curves (AUCs) and flow values.
Results
On DMI-20, prompts of 12.8 Mcps, DTF of 2.06 and SF of 46.1% were measured with 1257 MBq of activity. On the D690, prompts of 6.85 Mcps, DTF of 1.57 and SF of 32.5% were measured with 1230 MBq of activity. AUC values were linear over all activities. Mean wash-in flow error was − 9% for both systems whereas wash-out flow error was − 5% and − 6% for DMI-20 and D690. With the highest activity, wash-out flow error was − 12% and − 7% for the DMI-20 and D690.
Conclusion
DMI-20 and D690 preserved accurate flow quantification over all injected activities, with maximum error of − 12%. In the future, flow quantification accuracy over the activities and count-rates evaluated in this study should be assessed.
Funder
University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference28 articles.
1. Danad I, Uusitalo V, Kero T, Saraste A, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: Cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [15O]H2O PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1464-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.069.
2. Kero T, Nordström J, Harms HJ, Sörensen J, Ahlström H, Lubberink M. Quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging with integrated time-of-flight PET-MR. EJNMMI Phys 2017;4:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0171-2.
3. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med 1999;40:1848-56.
4. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, Dorbala S, Abi-Hatem N, Lahoud Y, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with 82Rb PET: Comparison with 13 N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1062-71. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.104.007831.
5. Siekkinen R, Teuho J, Smith NAS, Fenwick A, Kirjavainen AK, Koskensalo K, et al. Study of the effect of reconstruction parameters for myocardial perfusion imaging in PET with a novel flow phantom. Front Phys 2020;8:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00148.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献