Author:
Halwax Alexander,Sergeev Dmitry,Müller Michael,Schenk Johannes
Abstract
AbstractCalcium and magnesium oxide are important components of metallurgical slag systems. However, the literature values for the standard enthalpy of formation $${{\Delta }_{f}H}_{298}^{^\circ }$$
Δ
f
H
298
∘
of both oxides exhibit large variations in some cases. Since $${{\Delta }_{f}H}_{298}^{^\circ }$$
Δ
f
H
298
∘
is crucial for the modeling and prediction of equilibrium states and, thus, also for process optimization; it was determined by Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry (KEMS). Pure CaO as well as MgO were investigated in an iridium Knudsen cell. For this purpose, the intensities of the main species present in the gas phase were recorded in a temperature range between 1825 K to 2125 K and 1675 K to 2075 K, respectively, and their partial pressures were obtained. It was observed that CaO and MgO evaporated congruently with the main species in the gas phase, Ca, Mg, O, and O2. The experimental vapor pressures of the gas species in the study of MgO are in good agreement with the calculated values using FactSageTM 7.3 and the FactPS database, while those for the evaporation of CaO show significant differences. These calculations are based on available thermodynamic information, including the Gibbs energy functions of CaO(s), Ca(g), MgO(s), Mg(g), O(g), and O2(g). After calculating the partial pressures and equilibrium constants of reactions, an average formation enthalpy of $${{\Delta }_{f}H}_{298}^{^\circ }$$
Δ
f
H
298
∘
= − 624.5 ± 3.5 kJ/mol for CaO(s) and $${{\Delta }_{f}H}_{298}^{^\circ }$$
Δ
f
H
298
∘
= − 598 ± 10 kJ/mol for MgO(s) based on the third law method of thermodynamics were obtained. The deviation of $${{\Delta }_{f}H}_{298}^{^\circ }$$
Δ
f
H
298
∘
for MgO from the previous literature values can be attributed to the use of different ionization cross sections, temperature calibration, and variation of tabulated Gibbs energy functions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. W. Chase, Malcolm, Jr.: Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data: NIST-JANAF thermochemical tables, 4th ed., American Chemical Society and American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1998.
2. K.T. Jacob and V. Varghese: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1996, vol. 27B, pp. 647–51.
3. T. Wakasugi and N. Sano: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1989, vol. 20B, pp. 431–33.
4. S.-M. Liang, A. Kozlov, and R. Schmid-Fetzer: Int. J. Mater. Res., 2018, vol. 109, pp. 185–200.
5. Q. Wen, F. Shen, H. Zheng, J. Yu, X. Jiang, and Q. Gao: ISIJ Int., 2018, vol. 58, pp. 792–98.