Abstract
AbstractTechnical assistance and increased use of ICT in tax administrations hold promise for greater revenue collection. Yet, the evidence on how these activities work in the real-world circumstances of developing countries is scant. The paper attempts to fill this gap by evaluating an intervention undertaken jointly by the Finnish and Tanzanian revenue administrations. The programme introduced a new risk-based case selection method for enhancing the effectiveness of firm tax examinations in Tanzania complemented by supplementary staff training and developing management practices. Our results, stemming from a difference-in-differences analysis and administrative data from the Tanzanian Revenue Authority, indicate that the intervention increased the corrected amount of taxable income by approximately 20% during the first year of the new approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Addis Tax Initiative. (2021). 2019 ATI monitoring report. Bonn: International Tax Compact.
2. Adu-Ababio, K., Koivisto, A., Lungu, E., Mwale, E., Msoni, J., & Musole, K. (2023). Estimating tax gaps in Zambia: A bottom-up approach based on audit assessments. WIDER working paper 2023/25. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2023/333-8.
3. Advani, A., Elming, W., & Shaw, J. (2023). The dynamic effects of tax audits. Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01101
4. Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
5. Bachas, P., Brockmeyer, A., Ferreira, A., & Sarr, B. (2021). How to target enforcement at scale? Evidence from tax audits in Senegal. EDI working paper series 2022.