Abstract
AbstractRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that impacts patients’ quality of life. Sophisticated organization of care delivery drives quality improvement. Therefore, the study objective was establishing a validated process map of the care cycle for RA patients. Hence, increasing transparency and optimizing care delivery and identifying areas of improvement. To map the RA care cycle, the care delivery value chain (CDVC) approach was used as framework to document activities and resources systematically. A mixed method study was conducted where quantitative data on activities were collected from health records and unstructured interviews with medical staff were held. Consequently, the process map was separately validated in a consensus meeting with a delegation of the medical staff and patient advisory board. At the start of the care cycle, the focus is predominantly on defining the treat-to-target strategy and examining disease activity. Towards the monitoring phase, tapering medication and managing the disease through patient-reported outcome measures are becoming increasingly important. Although patient’s functioning, quality of care and patient’s evaluation of received care are monitored, reflection of CDVC and engaging patients in the evaluation process resulted in improvement actions on outcome and process level. Mapping the RA care cycle following a systematic approach, provides insight and transparency in delivered activities, involved resources and the engagement of patients and caregivers at multiple levels, contributing to a system facilitating value-based care delivery. The CDVC framework and applied methodology is recommended in other conditions. Future research will focus at assigning outcomes and costs to activities and evaluating interventions to explore patient value.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology
Reference22 articles.
1. Aletaha D, Neogi TS, Silman AJ et al (2010) Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1580–1588. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584
2. van den Dikkenberg M, Kuijper TM, Conijn N, Lopes Barreto D, Kok MR, Weel-Koenders AEAM (2020) Patient and clinical relevant outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis; experience from daily practice. ICHOM conference https://conference.ichom.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Marijke-van-den-Dikkenberg-ICHOM-PROs-in-RA.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2021
3. Petkovic J, Barton J, Flurey C et al (2017) Health equity considerations for developing and reporting patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: a report from the omeract equity special interest group. J Rheumatol 44(11):1727–1733. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.160975
4. Elf M, Flink M, Nilsson M, Tistad M, von Koch L, Yetterberg C (2017) The case of value-based healthcare for people living with complex long-term conditions. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1957-6
5. Porter ME, Teisberg Olmsted E (2006) Redefining healthcare. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献