Domestic Violence in Pregnant Trauma Patients: A Multicenter Analysis
-
Published:2024-08-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0885-7482
-
Container-title:Journal of Family Violence
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Fam Viol
Author:
Alvarez Claudia, Nahmias Jeffry, Lucas Alexa N., Fierro Nicole, Dhillon Navpreet K., Ley Eric J., Smith Jennifer, Burruss Sigrid, Dahan Alden, Johnson Arianne, Ganske William, Biffl Walter L., Bayat Dunya, Castelo Matthew, Wintz Diane, Zheng Dennis J., Tillou Areti, Coimbra Raul, Tuli Rahul, Santorelli Jarrett E., Emigh Brent, Schellenberg Morgan, Inaba Kenji, Duncan Thomas K., Diaz Graal, Tay-Lasso Erika, Aryan Negaar, Zezoff Danielle C., Grigorian AregORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Domestic violence (DV) during pregnancy is associated with a higher incidence of obstetric complications. This study aimed to identify the injury profile and outcomes of pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) presenting after DV. We hypothesize that PTPs presenting after DV have a higher rate of fetal delivery (FD) and adverse maternal outcomes, compared to propensity-matched PTPs sustaining non-DV trauma.
Methods
PTPs ≥ 18 years old were included in this post-hoc analysis of a multicenter retrospective (2016–2021) study at 12 Level-I/II trauma centers. An unmatched and a 1:2 propensity-matched analyses of PTPs presenting with mechanisms involving and not involving DV were performed.
Results
From 950 patients, 70 (7.4%) PTPs presented after DV. The median age of PTPs presenting after DV was 26 years, the most common ethnicity was Hispanic (40%), and the most common mechanism and injury type were assault (85.7%) and abdominal injury (11.4%). PTPs presenting after DV had a higher rate of head injury (10% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.026). There was no difference in maternal complications and rate of FD (p > 0.05). These results did not change in the 1:2 propensity-matched analysis.
Conclusion
Our study found a higher rate of head injuries among PTPs presenting after DV compared to similarly matched PTPs presenting after non-DV trauma. However, no significant differences were observed in the rate of FD or maternal and fetal complications. Examining the effectiveness of universal screening for DV in the trauma setting and prenatal care may help optimize care delivery and support services for affected PTPs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Albini, P. T., Zakhary, B., Edwards, S. B., Coimbra, R., & Brenner, M. L. (2023). Intimate Partner violence and pregnancy: Nationwide Analysis of Injury patterns and risk factors. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 236(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000421 2. Alfaro Quezada, J., Mustafa, Z., Zhang, X., Zakhary, B., Firek, M., Coimbra, R., & Brenner, M. (2020). A nationwide study of intimate Partner violence. American Surgeon, 86(10), 1230–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964191 3. Alhusen, J. L., Lucea, M. B., Bullock, L., & Sharps, P. (2013). Intimate partner violence, substance use, and adverse neonatal outcomes among urban women. Journal of Pediatrics, 163(2), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.036 4. Austin, P. C. (2011). Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.433 5. Bailey, B. A., & Daugherty, R. A. (2007). Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: Incidence and associated health behaviors in a rural population. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11(5), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0191-6
|
|