Prevalence and Correlates of Fearing a Partner During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Britain: Findings from Natsal-COVID
-
Published:2023-11-24
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0885-7482
-
Container-title:Journal of Family Violence
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Fam Viol
Author:
Willis MalachiORCID, Tanton Clare, Conolly Anne, Baxter Andrew J., Pérez Raquel Bosó, Riddell Julie, Dema Emily, Copas Andrew J., Macdowall Wendy, Bonell Chris, Mercer Catherine H., Sonnenberg Pam, Field Nigel, Mitchell Kirstin R.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown restrictions introduced personal and relationship stressors that potentially increased the risk of intimate partner violence (IPV) for some. We estimated the population prevalence and correlates of fearing a partner in the first year of the pandemic in Britain.
Method
We used data from Natsal-COVID Wave 2—a web-panel survey undertaken one year after the initial British lockdown from 23 March 2020. Quotas and weighting were used to achieve a quasi-representative sample of the general population. Participants were asked about fearing a partner, which is a simple and valid screening tool to identify IPV experiences.
Results
In our sample (unweighted n = 6302, aged 18–59), 9.0% of women and 8.7% of men reported fearing a partner in the first year of the pandemic. Women (73.3%) were more likely than men (49.9%) to indicate that fearing a partner made them feel anxious or depressed; men were more likely to report increased substance use (30.8% vs. 18.4%) and affected work/studies (30.0% vs. 20.0%). For both women and men, fearing a partner during the first year of the pandemic was associated with established health and wellbeing outcomes like anxiety/depression, alcohol use, accessing sexual/reproductive health services, and relationship dissolution as well as feeling that the “pandemic made things worse” across various life domains.
Conclusions
Population-level estimates of IPV during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight harmful experiences that occurred alongside other wide-ranging hardships, and the associations presented identify key populations with potential ongoing need. We make recommendations for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of IPV.
Funder
Wellcome Trust Economic and Social Research Council National Institute for Health Research Medical Research Council Chief Scientist Office
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology
Reference28 articles.
1. Bosó Pérez, R., Maxwell, K., Reid, D., Tanton, C., Macdowall, W., Bonell, C., …, Mitchell, K. (2021) P286 Qualitative findings from Natsal-COVID: Exploring difficulties and distress within established relationships during COVID-19 pandemic. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 97, A133–A134. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.350 2. Breiding, M., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. Retrieved from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/31292. Accessed 1 July 2022 3. Campbell, L., Tan, R. K., Uhlich, M., Francis, J. M., Mark, K., Miall, N., & Tucker, J. D. (2021). Intimate partner violence prior to and during COVID-19 measures in 30 countries: A global cross-sectional study from the I-SHARE Consortium. Social Science Research Network (SSRN) Preprint. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974550 4. Costa, D., Soares, J., Lindert, J., Hatzidimitriadou, E., Sundin, Ö., Toth, O., ... & Barros, H. (2015). Intimate partner violence: A study in men and women from six European countries. International Journal of Public Health, 60(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0663-1 5. Dema, E., Copas, A. J., Clifton, S., Conolly, A., Blake, M., Riddell, J., & Field, N. (2022). Methodology of Natsal-COVID Wave 1: A large, quasi-representative survey with qualitative follow-up measuring the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health in Britain. Wellcome Open Research, 6, 209. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16963.2
|
|