Abstract
AbstractThe social, financial, and emotional repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic has left many organizations that support survivors of intimate partner violence questioning how to maintain core services while addressing compounding individual, organizational, and public health issues. Stay-at-home orders and other COVID-19 mitigation strategies have resulted in reduced shelter availability and increased intimate partner violence rates. Coupled with the economic impact of the pandemic, these factors have threatened financial and housing stability. To better understand these challenges and provide immediate support, The National Alliance for Safe Housing (NASH) co-hosted a peer support call to provide a virtual platform for practitioners to ask questions, discuss challenges, and share strategies for quality service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Over 800 practitioners from across the United States participated in the NASH call, most of whom were advocates, program directors, and managers. NASH gathered data on practitioners’ needs from a brief survey from the registration form analyzed using conventional inductive content analysis. Practitioners’ primary concerns were situated within eight questions, which we categorized into four meta-categories: (1) managing residential housing programs; (2) getting survivors materials resources; (3) keeping staff safe; and (4) maintaining organizational operations. The paper concludes with community-grounded and empirically supported practice recommendations aligned with practitioners’ expressed needs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology
Reference25 articles.
1. Augusto de Lima, C., Alves, P., Barauna de Oliverira, C., Nascimento de Oliverira, T., Barbosa, K., Marcene, H., & Vilges de Oliveira, S. (2020). COVID-19: Isolations, quarantines and domestic violence in rural areas. SciMedicine Journal, 2(1), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.28991/SciMedJ-2020-0201-7.
2. Bradbury-Jones, C., & Isham, L. (2020). The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13–14), 2047–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15296.
3. Breckenridge, J., Chung, D., Spinney, A., & Zufferey, C. (2016). National mapping and meta-evaluation outlining key features of effective “Safe at Home” programs that enhance safety and prevent homelessness for women and their children who have experienced domestic and family violence: Final report. Sydney, Australia: ANROWS.
4. Cho, H., Shamrova, D., Han, J., & Levchenko, P. (2020). Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization and survivors’ help-seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4558–4582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715027.
5. Dichter, M. E., & Gelles, R. J. (2012). Women’s perceptions of safety and risk following police intervention for intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212437016.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献