Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Few studies have investigated how high-risk domestic and family violence perpetrators threaten staff, how organizations support staff, and whether communities of practice improve service coordination and the safety of workers and the families they serve. The purpose of this article is to explore worker safety among practitioners involved in high-risk domestic and family violence and child protection cases.
Methods
Participatory action research methodology was used to investigate and develop cross-sectoral workforce capacity at the intersection of domestic and family violence and child protection practice. This study, based in Queensland, Australia, drew on a subset of data from a larger study of communities of practice. Participants were 15 senior practitioners and team leaders from child protection, women’s and men’s domestic violence services, family support, and justice services. Data were collected in 2018. Data sources included ethnographic notes and transcripts from communities of practice and focus groups. Data were qualitatively analyzed.
Results
Five key themes emerged in the findings: risks to workers associated with the physical environment; advances in perpetrators’ use of technology; failings in police responses and the judicial system; a parallel process between workers’ and women’s responses to threats to their physical and psychological safety; and strategies for improving safety when working with high risk perpetrators of domestic and family violence.
Conclusions
Improving the physical and psychological safety of workers in high-risk domestic and family violence and child protection cases requires moving beyond intra-organizational policies and practices and addressing the inter-sectoral and systemic factors that increase risk and reduce safety for child and adult victim/survivors and workers.
Funder
Australia's National Research Organisation for Women's Safety
Southern Cross University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology
Reference33 articles.
1. Baynes, P., & Holland, S. (2012). Social work with violent men: A child protection file study in an English local authority. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1159
2. Ben-Porat, A. (2017). Competence of trauma social workers: The relationship between field of practice and secondary traumatization, personal and environmental variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(8), 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515588536
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Broadley, K., & Paterson, N. (2020). Client violence towards workers in the child, family and community welfare sector. Child Family Community Australia Paper No. 54. Southbank, Victoria: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
5. Button, D. M., & Payne, B. K. (2009). Training child protective services workers about domestic violence: Needs, strategies, and barriers. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.08.011
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献