Efficacies of anlotinib monotherapy versus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy
-
Published:2024-01-31
Issue:2
Volume:150
Page:
-
ISSN:1432-1335
-
Container-title:Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Author:
Zheng Aiping,Liu Jie,Liu Zijing,Mo Zeming,Fu Yang,Deng Yaotiao,Jiang Yu
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as subsequent treatment regimens in patients with advanced non-specific soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with advanced STS who were treated with either anlotinib or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between May 2009 and May 2023 in our center were eligible. All patients experienced disease progression or recurrence after the anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.
Results
We included 49 patients receiving anlotinib and 45 patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 76.9 weeks (range 2.9–678.9 weeks). The DCR (65.3% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.610), PFS (24.0 weeks vs. 18.6 weeks; p = 0.669) and OS (79.4 weeks vs. 87.0 weeks; p = 0.471) of anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy indicated similar clinical efficacy. Moreover, exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with STS originating from limbs and trunk were inclined to benefit from anlotinib treatment (median PFS: 31.3 weeks vs. 12.4 weeks; p = 0.045). ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the PFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11–0.85; p = 0.023] and OS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10–0.70; p = 0.008) in the anlotinib group. While neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic factor of the PFS (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.11–0.98; p = 0.045) in the gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher related AEs in anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 20.4% (n = 10) and 20.0% (n = 9), respectively.
Conclusion
Our research suggested that anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed similar clinical efficacy and safety in the subsequent treatment of advanced STS after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Baert T, Van Camp J, Vanbrabant L, Busschaert P, Laenen A, Han S, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Coosemans A (2018) Influence of CA125, platelet count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on the immune system of ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 150(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.004 2. Bay JO, Ray-Coquard I, Fayette J, Leyvraz S, Cherix S, Piperno-Neumann S, Chevreau C, Isambert N, Brain E, Emile G, Le Cesne A, Cioffi A, Kwiatkowski F, Coindre JM, Bui NB, Peyrade F, Penel N, Blay JY (2006) Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis. Int J Cancer 119(3):706–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21867 3. Cheng Y, Mo F, Pu L, Li Q, Ma X (2019) Pretreatment inflammatory indexes as prognostic predictors of survival in patients suffering from synovial sarcoma. Front Oncol 9:955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00955 4. Chi Y, Yao Y, Wang S, Huang G, Cai Q, Shang G, Wang G, Qu G, Wu Q, Jiang Y, Song J, Chen J, Zhu X, Cai Z, Bai C, Lu Y, Yu Z, Shen J, Cai J (2018) Anlotinib for metastasis soft tissue sarcoma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and multi-centered clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 36(15):11503–11503. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.11503 5. Cojocaru E, Napolitano A, Fisher C, Huang P, Jones RL, Thway K (2022) What’s the latest with investigational drugs for soft tissue sarcoma? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 31(11):1239–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2022.2152324
|
|