Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunichLMU Molecular Tumor Board
-
Published:2022-07-07
Issue:5
Volume:149
Page:1905-1915
-
ISSN:0171-5216
-
Container-title:Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Author:
Heinrich Kathrin, Miller-Phillips Lisa, Ziemann Frank, Hasselmann Korbinian, Rühlmann Katharina, Flach Madeleine, Biro Dorottya, von Bergwelt-Baildon Michael, Holch Julian, Herold Tobias, von Baumgarten Louisa, Greif Philipp A.ORCID, Jeremias Irmela, Wuerstlein Rachel, Casuscelli Jozefina, Spitzweg Christine, Seidensticker Max, Renz Bernhard, Corradini Stefanie, Baumeister Philipp, Goni Elisabetta, Tufman Amanda, Jung Andreas, Kumbrink Jörg, Kirchner Thomas, Klauschen Frederick, Metzeler Klaus H., Heinemann Volker, Westphalen C. BenediktORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In 2016, the University of Munich Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) was implemented to initiate a precision oncology program. This review of cases was conducted to assess clinical implications and functionality of the program, to identify current limitations and to inform future directions of these efforts.
Methods
Charts, molecular profiles, and tumor board decisions of the first 1000 consecutive cases (01/2016–03/2020) were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe relevant findings.
Results
Of the first 1000 patients presented to the MTB; 914 patients received comprehensive genomic profiling. Median age of patients was 56 years and 58% were female. The most prevalent diagnoses were breast (16%) and colorectal cancer (10%). Different types of targeted or genome-wide sequencing assays were used; most of them offered by the local department of pathology. Testing was technically successful in 88%. In 41% of cases, a genomic alteration triggered a therapeutic recommendation. The fraction of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation differed significantly between malignancies ranging from over 50% in breast or biliary tract to less than 30% in pancreatic cancers. Based on a retrospective chart review, 17% of patients with an MTB recommendation received appropriate treatment.
Conclusion
Based on these retrospective analyses, patients with certain malignancies (breast and biliary tract cancer) tend to be more likely to have actionable variants. The low rate of therapeutic implementation (17% of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation) underscores the importance of meticulous follow-up for these patients and ensuring broad access to innovative therapies for patients receiving molecular tumor profiling.
Funder
Universitätsklinik München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference45 articles.
1. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson AS, Borad MJ, Gallinson D, Murphy AG, Oh DY, Dotan E, Catenacci DV, Van Cutsem E, Ji T, Lihou CF, Zhen H, Feliz L, Vogel A (2020) Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 21(5):671–684 2. Bekaii-Saab TS, Valle JW, Cutsem EV, Rimassa L, Furuse J, Ioka T, Melisi D, Macarulla T, Bridgewater J, Wasan H, Borad MJ, Abou-Alfa GK, Jiang P, Lihou CF, Zhen H, Asatiani E, Feliz L, Vogel A (2020) FIGHT-302: first-line pemigatinib vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 rearrangements. Future Oncol 16:2385–2399 3. Bernhardt EB, Chamberlin MD, Gorlov IP, de Abreu FB, Bloch KJ, Peterson JD, Tsongalis GJ, Shirai K, Dragnev KH, Miller TW, Tafe LJ (2020) Molecular matching and treatment strategies for advanced stage lung cancer at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: a three-year review of a Molecular Tumor Board. Pract Lab Med 21:e00174 4. Bitzer M, Ostermann L, Horger M, Biskup S, Schulze M, Ruhm K, Hilke F, Oner O, Nikolaou K, Schroeder C, Riess O, Fend F, Zips D, Hinterleitner M, Zender L, Tabatabai G, Beha J, Malek NP (2020) Next-generation sequencing of advanced GI tumors reveals individual treatment options. JCO Precis Oncol 4:258–271 5. Brock A, Huang S (2017) Precision oncology: between vaguely right and precisely wrong. Cancer Res 77(23):6473–6479
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|