Abstract
Abstract
Background
We explored the hypothesis that high-quality standards in diagnostic mammography can lead to an early diagnosis of breast cancers and identifies at risk populations outside screening programs. The histopathological features and distribution of the TNM classification were examined in relation to patient age in a large group of women with breast cancers participating in the Quality Assured Mamma Diagnostic (QuaMaDi) program of the state of Schleswig–Holstein.
Patients and methods
Surgical pathological reports were studied for clinicopathological characteristics, receptor status, molecular subtype and tumor stage. The analysis was conducted by dividing the study population into three age groups: women under 50 years (pre-screening), 50–69 years (peri-screening) and over 70 years (post-screening).
Results
7.111 biopsies and 2.887 resection specimens were included. Breast cancer was diagnosed in 4.241 (59.7%) cases, one fourth of them in women < 50 years. Elderly women (> 70 years) had more well-differentiated, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-negative carcinomas, whereas younger women (< 50 years) tended to have more poorly differentiated, ER negative, and HER2-positive carcinomas. 47% of breast carcinoma were luminal B tumors and were most common regardless of age. 70.4% of resected specimen had pT1 stage. Nodal negative were 71.2%.
Conclusion
In QuaMaDi breast cancer was diagnosed at an early and potentially curable stage of the disease due to high-quality standards in diagnostic mammography. In addition, regardless of age, an increased number of prognostically unfavorable molecular subtypes were detected. Thus, QuaMaDi helps to identify at risk populations. QuaMaDi significantly improves diagnostic mammography and complements mammography screening programs.
Funder
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference42 articles.
1. Andersson I, Janzon L (1997) Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.63
2. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F et al (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ 297:943–948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943
3. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nyström L et al (2003) The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 97:2387–2396. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11361
4. Collins LC, Marotti JD, Gelber S, Cole K, Ruddy K, Kereakoglow S et al (2012) Pathologic features and molecular phenotype by patient age in a large cohort of young women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1872-9
5. Cooperative Association of the German Mammography Screening Program (2018) Annual report Evaluation 2016. The German Mammography Screening Program, https://fachservice.mammo-programm.de/download/downloads/KOOPMAMMO_Jahresbericht_Eval_2016_20191114_web.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献