Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Tumor location and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage guide treatment decisions in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, patients with the same disease stage do not benefit equally from adjuvant therapy. Hence, there remains an urgent clinical need to identify prognostic and/or predictive biomarker(s) to personalize treatment decisions. In this exploratory study, we investigated whether our previously defined metabolic Warburg-subtypes can predict which CRC patients might derive survival benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Methods
Information regarding treatment (surgery only: n = 1451; adjuvant radiotherapy: n = 82; or adjuvant chemotherapy: n = 260) and Warburg-subtype (Warburg-low: n = 485, -moderate: n = 641, or –high: n = 667) was available for 1793 CRC patients from the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS). Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to investigate survival benefit from adjuvant therapy compared to surgery-only for the different Warburg-subtypes.
Results
Patients with Warburg-moderate CRC (HRCRC-specific 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.86, HRoverall 0.61; 95% CI 0.47–0.80), and possibly Warburg-high CRC (HRCRC-specific 0.86; 95% CI 0.65–1.14, HRoverall 0.82; 95% CI 0.64–1.05), had survival benefit from adjuvant therapy. No survival benefit was observed for patients with Warburg-low CRC (HRCRC-specific 1.07; 95% CI 0.76–1.52, HRoverall 0.95; 95% CI 0.70–1.30). There was a significant interaction between Warburg-subtype and adjuvant therapy for CRC-specific survival (p = 0.049) and overall survival (p = 0.035).
Conclusion
Our results suggest that Warburg-subtypes may predict survival benefit from adjuvant therapy in CRC patients. A survival benefit from adjuvant therapy was observed for patients with Warburg-moderate and possibly Warburg-high CRC, but not for patients with Warburg-low CRC. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference48 articles.
1. Alexander LK, Lopes B, Ricchetti-Masterson K, Yeatts KB (2015) Confounding bias, part II and effect measure modification. UNC CH Department of Epidemiology
2. Bensinger SJ, Christofk HR (2012) New aspects of the Warburg effect in cancer cell biology. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23(4):352–361
3. Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, van de Pol A, van Krieken JH, Meijer GA (2007) Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol 29(1):19–24
4. Denise C, Paoli P, Calvani M, Taddei ML, Giannoni E, Kopetz S, Kazmi SMA, Pia MM, Pettazzoni P, Sacco E (2015) 5-fluorouracil resistant colon cancer cells are addicted to OXPHOS to survive and enhance stem-like traits. Oncotarget 6(39):41706
5. Desbats MA, Giacomini I, Prayer-Galetti T, Montopoli M (2020) Metabolic plasticity in chemotherapy resistance. Front Oncol 10:281