Author:
Maddah Safaei Afsane,Esmati Ebrahim,Gomar Marzieh,Akhavan Setareh,Sheikh Hasani Shahrzad,Malekzadeh Moghani Mona,Zamani Narges,Moshtaghi Maryam,Malek Mahrooz,Jafari Fatemeh,Sharifian Azadeh,Kolahdouzan Kasra
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Concurrent chemoradiation has been the mainstay of treatment for cervix cancer. We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of hypofractionated chemoradiation.
Methods
This study was designed as a phase 2, 1:1 randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled, non-inferiority trial and we report the interim results after 50% accrual. Cervical cancer patients with FIGO stages IIA–IIIC were recruited from April 2021 to September 2022. The intervention consisted of 40 Gy of 3D-conformal radiation therapy (RT) in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. In the control group, patients received standard chemoradiation of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Both groups received concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2). Intravaginal brachytherapy of 28 Gy in 4 weekly fractions was delivered starting 1 week after the end of chemoradiation. The primary outcome was complete clinical response(CCR) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included acute gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary(GU), skin, and hematologic toxicities. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant for analyses.
Results
59 patients were randomized; 30 in the control group and 29 in the intervention group. 20/30 (66.7%) of the patients in the control group and 19/29 (65.5%) in the intervention group achieved a CCR (absolute difference of 0.011, 95% CI − 0.23 to 0.25, p value: 0.13). There was a significantly higher rate of acute grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity in the intervention group (27.6%) compared with the control group (6.7%) (p value 0.032).
Conclusions
Despite an absolute difference of 1.1% in the 3-month CCR, our interim analysis failed to show the non-inferiority of the hypofractionated chemoradiation. Due to the higher GI toxicities, we will continue this trial using intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Registration number and date
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831437, 2021.4.1.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Campbell OB, Akinlade IB, Arowojolu A, Babarinsa IA, Agwimah RI, Adewole IF (2000) Comparative evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the cervix in Ibadan Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 29(3–4):253–258
2. Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L (2019) Cervical cancer. Lancet 393(10167):169–182
3. Fowler JF (2010) 21 years of biologically effective dose. Br J Radiol 83(991):554–568
4. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J et al (2005) Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group☆(I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 74(3):235–245
5. Huilgol NG, Mehta AR, Kulkarni V, Selvaraj N, Trivedi N (1988) Hypofractionated external radiation with high and low dose rates in the treatment of advanced cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14(3):577–579