Abstract
AbstractPurposeOne-to-one peer supporters called isPO onco-guides (isPO OGs) are an integral part of the new German psycho-oncological form of care ‘integrated, cross-sectoral Psycho-Oncology’ (isPO), additionally to professional care. The isPO OGs are cancer survivors with experiential knowledge, offering information on local support services and answering questions ‘all around cancer’ to newly diagnosed cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the isPO OG service from three perspectives: patients, isPO OGs, and professional service providers.MethodsA mixed-methods approach was pursued. We conducted interviews and focus groups with the three person groups, and applied qualitative content analysis on the reported resources, processes and outcomes regarding the isPO OG service. Relations with patients’ utilisation and isPO OGs’ work satisfaction were identified with regression and correlation analyses of questionnaire and isPO care data. We compared isPO care networks (CN) withX2-tests or ANOVA. Qualitative and quantitative results were integrated during interpretation phase.ResultsQualitatively, the three person groups agreed on the benefits of the isPO OG service. The implementation’s maturity differed between the CN concerning established processes and resource availability. Attitudes of professional service providers appeared to be crucial for patients’ utilisation of the isPO OG service. Quantitative results emphasised the differences between the CN.ConclusionBeyond differences in the CN, the isPO OG service has two psychosocial benefits: providing relevant, reliable, and understandable information; and offering the encouraging example that surviving and living with cancer is possible.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00015326) on 30.10.2018.
Funder
Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference71 articles.
1. Adler NE, Page AEK (eds) (2008) Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs, Washington (DC)
2. Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137284
3. Antonovsky A (1988) Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
4. Beierlein C, Kovaleva A, László Z, Kemper CJ, Rammstedt B (2014) Eine Single-Item-Skala zur Erfassung der Allgemeinen Lebenszufriedenheit: Die Kurzskala Lebenszufriedenheit-1 (L-1). GESIS-Working Papers, Mannheim
5. Beutel ME, Brähler E, Wiltink J, Michal M, Klein EM, Jünger C, Wild PS, Münzel T, Blettner M, Lackner K, Nickels S, Tibubos AN (2017) Emotional and tangible social support in a German population-based sample: Development and validation of the brief social support scale (BS6). PLoS One 12:e0186516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186516
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献