Systematic symptom screening in patients with advanced cancer treated in certified oncology centers: results of the prospective multicenter German KeSBa project

Author:

Braulke Friederike,Para Servet,Alt-Epping Bernd,Tewes Mitra,Bäumer Markus,Haberland Birgit,Mayer-Steinacker Regine,Hopprich Anne,de Wit Maike,Grabe Michaela,Bender-Säbelkampf Sophia,Weßling Caroline,Aulmann Christoph,Gerlach Christina,Regincos Pascale,Fischer Ferdinand,Haarmann Soraya,Huys Tatjana,Drygas Sabine,Rambau Anett,Kiani Alexander,Schnabel Astrid,Buhl Christoph,Seipke Stefanie,Hiemer Sonja,Polata Silke,Meßmann Maximilian,Hansmeier Anna,Anastasiadou Louiza,Letsch Anne,Wecht Daniel,Hellberg-Naegele Matthias,Krug Utz,Wedding UlrichORCID,van Oorschot Birgitt

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Guidelines recommend a structured symptom screening (SC) for especially advanced cancer patients (CPs). The aim of this multicenter German prospective quality assurance project KeSBa (Kennzahl Symptom- und Belastungserfassung) was to gain knowledge on SC procedures in Oncology Centers (OCs) for advanced cancer patients and a first impression on the consequences of SC. Methods The KeSBa project consisted of three phases: pilot, 3 months screening and feedback phase. Participating OCs decided to use either the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) or the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) and defined the cutoff values for positive screening results. Results Out of 172 certified German OCs, 40 (23%) participated in the KeSBa pilot phase, 29 (16.8%) in the 3 months screening phase using MIDOS (n = 18, 58.6%) or IPOS (n = 11, 41.3%) and in the feedback round. 25/29 performed paper-based screening (86.2%). 2.963 CPs were screened. Results were documented for 1255 (42.2%, SC +) positive and 874 (29.5%, SC–) negative screenings depending on the center´s schedules: 452 SC + CPs (28.4%) and 42 SC– CPs (2.6%) had contact to specialized palliative care or other supportive specialist teams afterwards, 458 SC + CPs (28.8%) and 605 SC– CPs (38.1%) remained in standard oncology care. In the feedback round missing resources (personal and IT) and improved communication were mentioned most often. Conclusion Routine SC is feasible in advanced CPs treated in OCs but associated with considerable workload. In 42.2% of CPs SC was classified as positive, indicating the need of further diagnostics or professional judgment. SC requires staff and IT resources.

Funder

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D, Sutradhar R, Earle C, Liu Y, Stitt A, Husain A, Sussman J, Dudgeon D (2010) Symptom burden and performance status in a population-based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 116(24):5767–5776. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25681. (Epub 2010 Nov 8 PMID: 21136579)

2. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, Rogak L, Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Atkinson TM, Chou JF, Dulko D, Sit L, Barz A, Novotny P, Fruscione M, Sloan JA, Schrag D (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34(6):557–565. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830

3. Basch E, Dueck AC, Rogak LJ, Minasian LM, Kelly WK, O’Mara AM, Denicoff AM, Seisler D, Atherton PJ, Paskett E, Carey L, Dickler M, Heist RS, Himelstein A, Rugo HS, Sikov WM, Socinski MA, Venook AP, Weckstein DJ, Lake DE, Biggs DD, Freedman RA, Kuzma C, Kirshner JJ, Schrag D (2017) Feasibility assessment of patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events in multicenter cancer clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 3(8):1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6749.PMID:28208174;PMCID:PMC5553624

4. Basch E, Schrag D, Henson S, Jansen J, Ginos B, Stover AM, Carr P, Spears PA, Jonsson M, Deal AM, Bennett AV, Thanarajasingam G, Rogak LJ, Reeve BB, Snyder C, Bruner D, Cella D, Kottschade LA, Perlmutter J, Geoghegan C, Samuel-Ryals CA, Given B, Mazza GL, Miller R, Strasser JF, Zylla DM, Weiss A, Blinder VS, Dueck AC (2022) Effect of electronic symptom monitoring on patient-reported outcomes among patients with metastatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327(24):2413–2422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.9265.PMID:35661856;PMCID:PMC9168923

5. Book K, Marten-Mittag B, Henrich G, Dinkel A, Scheddel P, Sehlen S, Haimerl W, Schulte T, Britzelmeir I, Herschbach P (2011) Distress screening in oncology-evaluation of the questionnaire on distress in cancer patients-short form (QSC-R10) in a German sample. Psychooncology 20(3):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1821. (PMID: 20669340)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3