Psychophysiological and Psychosocial Profile of Patients Attending Drug Addiction Centers
-
Published:2021-12-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1090-0586
-
Container-title:Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
Author:
Clemente-Suárez Vicente JavierORCID, Ruisoto PabloORCID, Isorna-Folgar Manuel, Cancelo-Martínez Jesús, Beltrán-Velasco Ana Isabel, Tornero-Aguilera José Francisco
Abstract
AbstractDrug treatment centres provide the highest level of rehab services for patients diagnosed with drug addictions. Most inpatient drug rehab programs focus on medical detox and mental health interventions. However, how to optimize the later remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to examine the psychophysiological and psychosocial profile of patients attending drug addiction centres in comparation with the general population. A total of 105 inpatient drug rehab patients and 50 participants from the general population were compared based on standardized psychophysiological and psychosocial measures. Results of this study suggest that patients attending drug addiction centers differ from general population in several different psychophysiological and psychosocial factors. Patients reported significantly lower levels of physical activity and increased sympathetic responsiveness, and significantly higher levels in loneliness, psychologically inflexibility and neuroticism. The results of this study highlight the importance of address healthy lifestyle behaviors such as sport practice and psychological variables such as loneliness, psychological (in)flexibility and neuroticism to improve current programs aim to prevent or reduce problematic drug consumptions.
Funder
Universidad Europea de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference38 articles.
1. Acharya, U. R., Kannathal, N., Sing, O. W., Ping, L. Y., & Chua, T. (2004). Heart rate analysis in normal subjects of various age groups. Biomedical Engineering Online, 3(24), 1–8. 2. Bardo, M. T., & Compton, W. M. (2015). Does physical activity protect against drug abuse vulnerability? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 153, 3–13. 3. Billman, G. E., Cagnoli, K. L., Csepe, T., Li, N., Wright, P., Mohler, P. J., & Fedorov, V. V. (2015). Exercise training-induced bradycardia: evidence for enhanced parasympathetic regulation without changes in intrinsic sinoatrial node function. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985), 118(11), 1344–1355. 4. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688 5. Bustamante-Sánchez, Á., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., Fernández-Elías, V. E., Hormeño-Holgado, A. J., Dalamitros, A. A., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2020). Effect of stress on autonomic and cardiovascular systems in military population: A systematic review. Cardiology Research and Practice, 2020, 7986249.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|