Expiratory-gated Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) does not Further Augment Heart Rate Variability During Slow Breathing at 0.1 Hz
-
Published:2023-03-15
Issue:3
Volume:48
Page:323-333
-
ISSN:1090-0586
-
Container-title:Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
Author:
Szulczewski Mikołaj TytusORCID, D’Agostini MartinaORCID, Van Diest IlseORCID
Abstract
AbstractAs cardiac vagal control is a hallmark of good health and self-regulatory capacity, researchers are seeking ways to increase vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) in an accessible and non-invasive way. Findings with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have been disappointing in this respect, as its effects on vmHRV are inconsistent at best. It has been speculated that combining taVNS with other established ways to increase vmHRV may produce synergistic effects. To test this idea, the present study combined taVNS with slow breathing in a cross-over design. A total of 22 participants took part in two sessions of breathing at 6 breaths/min: once combined with taVNS, and once combined with sham stimulation. Electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 400 µs) was applied during expiration, either to the tragus and cavum conchae (taVNS) or to the earlobe (sham). ECG was recorded during baseline, 20-minutes of stimulation, and the recovery period. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses showed no effect of taVNS (in comparison to sham stimulation) on the root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats, mean inter-beat interval, or spectral power of heart rate variability at a breathing frequency of 0.1 Hz. These findings suggest that expiratory-gated taVNS combined with the stimulation parameters examined here does not produce acute effects on vmHRV during slow breathing.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference57 articles.
1. Borges, U., Laborde, S., & Raab, M. (2019). Influence of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cardiac vagal activity: Not different from sham stimulation and no effect of stimulation intensity. PloS one, 14(10), e0223848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223848. 2. Borges, U., Pfannenstiel, M., Tsukahara, J., Laborde, S., Klatt, S., & Raab, M. (2021). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation via tragus or cymba conchae: Are its psychophysiological effects dependent on the stimulation area? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 161, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.01.003. 3. Burger, A. M., D’Agostini, M., Verkuil, B., Diest, I. V. (n.d.). Moving beyond belief: A narrative review of potential biomarkers for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation., & Psychophysiology, n/a(n/a), e13571. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13571 4. Chakravarthy, K., Chaudhry, H., Williams, K., & Christo, P. J. (2015). Review of the Uses of Vagal nerve stimulation in Chronic Pain Management. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 19(12), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-015-0528-6. 5. Farmer, A. D., Strzelczyk, A., Finisguerra, A., Gourine, A. V., Gharabaghi, A., Hasan, A., Burger, A. M., Jaramillo, A. M., Mertens, A., Majid, A., Verkuil, B., Badran, B. W., Ventura-Bort, C., Gaul, C., Beste, C., Warren, C. M., Quintana, D. S., Hämmerer, D., Freri, E., & Koenig, J. (2020). International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus nerve stimulation (Version 2020). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|