Clinical Value of Using Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Before Elective CT Coronary Angiography to Reduce Heart Rate and the Need for Beta-Blockers
-
Published:2023-06-21
Issue:4
Volume:48
Page:393-401
-
ISSN:1090-0586
-
Container-title:Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
Author:
Langguth Patrick,Wolf Carmen,Sedaghat Sam,Huhndorf Monika,Frank Johanne,Both Marcus,Jansen Olav,Salehi Ravesh Mona,Lebenatus Annett
Abstract
AbstractThe value of biofeedback before elective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to reduce patients’ heart rates (HR) was investigated in the current work. Sixty patients who received CCTA to exclude coronary artery disease were included in our study and separated into two groups: with biofeedback (W-BF) and without biofeedback (WO-BF). The W-BF group used a biofeedback device for 15 min before CCTA. HR was determined in each patient at four measurement time points (MTP): during the pre-examination interview (MTP1), positioning on the CT patient table before CCTA (MTP2), during CCTA image acquisition (MTP3), and after completing CCTA (MTP4). If necessary, beta-blockers were administered in both groups after MTP2 until a HR of less than 65 bpm was achieved. Two board-certified radiologists subsequently assessed the image quality and analyzed the findings. Overall, the need for beta-blockers was significantly lower in patients in the W-BF group than the WO-BF group (p = 0.032). In patients with a HR of 81–90, beta-blockers were not required in four of six cases in the W-BF group, whereas in the WO-BF group all patients needed beta-blockers (p = 0.03). The amount of HR reduction between MTP1 and MTP2 was significantly higher in the W-BF compared to the WO-BF group (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between the W-BF and WO-BF groups regarding image quality (p = 0.179). By using biofeedback prior to elective CCTA, beta-blocker use could be decreased without compromising CT image quality and analysis, especially in patients with an initial HR of 81–90 bpm.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference22 articles.
1. Bing, R., Singh, T., Dweck, M. R., Mills, N. L., Williams, M. C., Adamson, P. D., & Newby, D. E. (2020). Validation of European Society of cardiology pre-test probabilities for obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected stable angina. European Heart Journal—Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 6, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa006 2. Dalen, J. E., Alpert, J. S., Goldberg, R. J., & Weinstein, R. S. (2014). The epidemic of the 20(th) century: Coronary heart disease. American Journal of Medicine, 127, 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.015 3. Earls, J. P. (2009). How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 3, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.013 4. Frank, D. L., Khorshid, L., Kiffer, J. F., Moravec, C. S., & McKee, M. G. (2010). Biofeedback in medicine: Who, when, why and how? Mental Health in Family Medicine, 7, 85–91. 5. Goessl, V. C., Curtiss, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G. (2017). The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 47, 2578–2586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001003.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|