Abstract
AbstractThe present work is focused on analyzing how e-navigation will affect the daily work of seafarers involved in bridge-related operations. Within e-navigation, the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) is currently working in the development of the new standard (S-100) whose role is to guarantee a homogeneous management of the maritime domain data. S-100 is called to act as the Common Maritime Data Structure (CMDS), it represents the technical framework required to guarantee a wider and better use of maritime data. The mission of the standard is to create a common foundation that can be used for multiple purposes; meteorologists, physicists, and whoever is interested in developing maritime related products will refer to the same standard. Not having a homogeneous type of data processed with standardized procedures will allow a better combination and processing of maritime data. Considering the perspective of Hydrographic Offices, the objective of the present document is to analyze the impact which e-navigation will have over seafarers. The study is focused on the evaluation of the risks connected to S-100-based products and on the analysis of specific bridge operations. Considering that e-navigation products are still at their design phase, being aware of the consequences for the final users is essential to make S-100-based products more customer oriented and to allow seafarers who are involved in bridge operations to get familiar with this new technology.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Genova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Transportation,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference51 articles.
1. Adam Weintrit, Stawicki Krzysztof (2008) Operational requirements for electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS). Risk of overreliance on ECDIS. Transport Problems 3:75–82 (ISSN 2300-861X)
2. Adland RO, Jia H (2016) Vessel speed analytics using satellite-based ship position data, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 1299–1303. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798088
3. Anette K, Johan K, Martina B, Jörgen E (2017) HTO – a complementary ergonomics approach. Appl Ergon 59(Part A):182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.024 (ISSN 0003-6870)
4. Awan Malik SK, Mohammed Al Ghamdi, A. (2019) Understanding the vulnerabilities in digital components of an integrated bridge system (IBS). J Mar Eng Technol 7(10):350. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7100350
5. Bailey NJ, Ellis N, Sampson H (2008) Training and technology onboard ship: how seafarers learned to use the shipboard Automatic Identification System (AIS), Cardiff, UK: Seafarers International Research Centre (SIRC), Cardiff University
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献