Abstract
AbstractCriminal investigation adopts Artificial Intelligence to enhance the volume of the facts that can be investigated and documented in trials. However, the abstract reasoning implied in legal justification and argumentation requests to adopt solutions providing high precision, low generalization error, and retrospective transparency. Three requirements that hardly coexist in today’s Artificial Intelligence solutions. In a controlled experiment, we then investigated the use of graph embeddings procedures to retrieve potential criminal actions based on patterns defined in enquiry protocols. We observed that a significant level of accuracy can be achieved but different graph reformation procedures imply different levels of precision, generalization, and transparency.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Software
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Automatic transparency evaluation for open knowledge extraction systems;Journal of Biomedical Semantics;2023-08-31
2. Data Fusion and Graph Analysis in Fraud Transaction Detection: walkthrough of a case study;2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data);2022-12-17
3. Toward a General Framework for Multimodal Big Data Analysis;Big Data;2022-10-01
4. Digital Health Data, a Way to Take Under Control the Quality During the Elaboration Processes;2022 16th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS);2022-10
5. Pattern Matching Algorithm in Event Graphs;2022 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech);2022-09-12