Abstract
AbstractIn the field of assessing forest ecosystem service provision and biodiversity, there seems to be a gap between an existing large body of valuable expert knowledge and its application. We propose fuzzy logic evaluation systems as a contribution to closing that gap. With this method-focused pilot study, we explored the potential of fuzzy logic for assessing the provision of different ecosystem services in a simulation case study, covering a large forest landscape in Southern Germany. Based on expert knowledge and available literature, we designed a fuzzy logic evaluation system for biodiversity, and the ecosystem services balanced wood production, storm and bark beetle damage resistance, and recreation value. This evaluation system was applied to 100-year simulation outcomes for three contrasting forest management scenarios in the landscape of interest. While the results of the case study in general support the idea of a multifunctional forest management, fuzzy logic turned out pronouncedly useful as a method. This is due to its potential to make otherwise unused expert knowledge applicable and transparent in a formal evaluation process. Based on our results, we discuss the approach related to its potential for interdisciplinary integration of knowledge, for revealing tradeoffs and synergies, and participative planning processes.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference113 articles.
1. Albrecht A (2009) Sturmschadensanalysen langfristiger waldwachstumskundlicher Versuchsflächendaten in Baden-Württemberg, Schriftenreihe Freiburger forstliche Forschung. Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg
2. Ammer U, Pröbstl U (1991) Freizeit und natur: probleme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten einer ökologisch verträglichen Freizeitnutzung. Paul Parey BerlinHamburg
3. Arnberger A, Ebenberger M, Schneider IE, Cottrell S, Schlueter AC, von Ruschkowski E, Venette RC, Snyder SA, Gobster PH (2018) Visitor preferences for visual changes in bark beetle-impacted forest recreation settings in the united states and Germany. Environ Manag 61:209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0975-4
4. Assmann E (1961a) Waldertragskunde. BLV, München, Bonn, Wien
5. Assmann E (1961b) Wald Und Zahl. Allg Forstz 16:1–3
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献