Abstract
AbstractClimate change mitigation trade-offs between increasing harvests to exploit substitution effects versus accumulating forest carbon sequestration complicate recommendations for climate beneficial forest management. Here, a time dynamic assessment ascertains climate change mitigation potential from different rotation forest management alternatives across three Swedish regions integrating the forest decision support system Heureka RegWise with a wood product model using life cycle assessment data. The objective is to increase understanding on the climate effects of varying the forest management. Across all regions, prolonging rotations by 20% leads on average to the largest additional net climate benefit until 2050 in both, saved emissions and temperature cooling, while decreasing harvests by 20% leads to the cumulatively largest net climate benefits past 2050. In contrast, increasing harvests or decreasing the rotation period accordingly provokes temporally alternating net emissions, or slight net emission, respectively, regardless of a changing market displacement factor. However, future forest calamities might compromise potential additional temperature cooling from forests, while substitution effects, despite probable prospective decreases, require additional thorough and time explicit assessments, to provide more robust policy consultation.
Funder
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Stora Enso
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference108 articles.
1. APLP (2021) Lightweight Pallets APLP 1208. Robust Lightweights. 1200 x 800 mm. Associated Plastic Pallets Ltd.
2. Arehart JH, Hart J, Pomponi F, D’Amico B (2021) Carbon sequestration and storage in the built environment. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.028
3. Baul TK, Alam A, Strandman H, Kilpeläinen A (2017) Net climate impacts and economic profitability of forest biomass production and utilization in fossil fuel and fossil-based material substitution under alternative forest management. Biomass Bioenerg 98:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.007
4. Biber P, Felton A, Nieuwenhuis M, Lindbladh M, Black K, Bahýl’, J et al (2020) Forest biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and wood production: modeling synergies and trade-offs for ten forest landscapes across Europe. Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696
5. Börjesson P, Tufvesson L, Lantz M (2010) Livscykelanalys av svenska biodrivmedel. Environmental and Energy System Studies report no. 70. Lund University
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献