Coppice reintroduction in the Czech Republic: extent, motivation and obstacles

Author:

Kozdasová Anežka,Galčanová Batista Lucie,Hédl Radim,Szabó Péter

Abstract

AbstractCoppicing is a form of forest management in European broadleaved forests. While it is still practised in south-eastern Europe, in central and western Europe it was almost completely replaced by high forest management. Currently, there are increasing efforts to reintroduce coppice management into former coppice woods. However, little comprehensive knowledge is available about the extent and management of coppice reintroduction and the processes governing it. In this paper, we present an overview of localities in the Czech Republic where coppice reintroduction was taking place in 2020. We identified 8 localities and conducted 10 semi-structured interviews with experts involved in their management in order to understand what motivated them to restart coppicing and what obstacles they have had to face. The main motivation of site managers is nature conservation, while the most important obstacles are operational issues, such as bureaucracy, complicated land ownership and legal responsibilities or lack of workforce. Other motivating factors identified in other European countries (production of a renewable energy source and potential for rural employment) have so far played a minor role in the Czech Republic. We conclude that a major challenge for future forest policies will be to utilise the economic experiences of regions with active coppicing to foster the spread of coppice woods in order to combine renewable energy production with biodiversity conservation.

Funder

Technology Agency of the Czech Republic

Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Plant Science,Forestry

Reference65 articles.

1. Bartlett D (2016) Traditional coppice in South East England: the importance of workforce engagement for development. iForest 9:577–582. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1809-009

2. Bartlett D, Laina R, Županić M, Gómez Martín E (2018) The potential barriers to persistence and development of small scale coppice forest management in Europe. In: Unrau A, Becker G, Spinelli R, Lazdina D, Magagnotti N, Nicolescu VN, Buckley P, Bartlett D, Kofman PD (eds) Coppice forests in Europe. Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Freiburg i. Br., Germany, pp 166–173

3. Brinkmann S, Kvale S (2015) Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Los Angeles

4. Bryman A (2008) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, London

5. Buckley P (2020) Coppice restoration and conservation: a European perspective. J For Res 25(3):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2020.1763554

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3