Abstract
AbstractSmall-scale private forests cover large areas in Europe and often contain structures and habitats of high nature conservation value that are increasingly put under pressure due to a rising interest in fuelwood and wood products. We investigate the distribution of variables like living tree and deadwood volumes, management intensity, diversity and density of tree-related microhabitats recorded in 81 small-scale private forest parcels in the Lower Saxon Hills (northwest Germany). We provide an assessment of the influence of predictors like the individual forest owners’ goals and activities, as stated by them in a quantitative survey, as well as landscape parameters like parcel size, slope, landscape fragmentation and forest continuity. Our results indicate that there are two types of structures of conservation value in small-scale private forests: slowly evolving structures (type A) like large-diameter living trees and tree-related microhabitats which mostly depend on landscape parameters that act on longer time scales, and fast evolving structures (type B) like deadwood that are influenced by both owner attitudes and landscape parameters. The resulting implications for integrative forest and conservation management are discussed. When considering the conservation of the slowly evolving type A structures, long-term commitments to conservation legislation, financial incentives and generation-spanning education of forest owners are necessary. Efforts to promote the faster evolving type B structures might prove particularly advantageous in small-scale private forests given the structural diversity of the stands, but also the often strong identification of owners with their land.
Graphical abstract
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Agency of Renewable Resources
Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Adelmann W, Hagge J, Langhammer P, Höhna N, Hotes S, Werneyer M, Drexler M, Müller J (2021) Aktiv im Wald: Naturschutz mit der Kettensäge. Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, Laufen
2. Asbeck T, Großmann J, Paillet Y, Winiger N, Bauhus J (2021a) The use of tree-related microhabitats as forest biodiversity indicators and to guide integrated forest management. Curr For Rep 7:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00132-5
3. Asbeck T, Kozák D, Spînu AP, Mikoláš M, Zemlerová V, Svoboda M (2021b) Tree-related microhabitats follow similar patterns but are more diverse in primary compared to managed temperate mountain forests. Ecosystems 25:712–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00681-1
4. Bauhus J (2022) Die Anpassung der Wälder an den Klimawandel – eine waldwirtschaftliche Perspektive. Nat Landsch 97:318–324. https://doi.org/10.19217/NuL2022-07-01
5. Bieling C (2004) Non-industrial private-forest owners: Possibilities for increasing adoption of close-to-nature forest management. Eur J For Res 123:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-004-0042-6