Abstract
AbstractCavities made by birds are an important microhabitat for many taxa in forests. Long-term dynamics of cavity patterns and the effect of forest management on cavities are, however, largely unknown. We studied cavity production, measured as nest cavity production rates (CPR = no. of new cavities/km2/year), of woodpeckers and tits in forests with different management intensity in southern Finland, based on a data from 37 years. Forests were divided into managed, seminatural and natural stands. The data covered 56 forest stands with the total area of 1690 ha. Stands were inventoried annually for new cavities. The total numbers of woodpecker and tit cavities were 2238 and 329, respectively. There were large differences in CPRs between forest stands with different management intensity. For woodpeckers, the CPR was highest in natural forests (5.7) and lowest in managed forests (1.5). For the tit species, the respective numbers were 0.9 and 0.3. The CPRs of different cavity-making bird species and cavity tree characteristics (e.g. tree condition and species) were consistent, suggesting that different cavity-makers benefit from similar forest and tree characteristics. The results also suggest that forests managed with currently prevailing methods limit the production of cavities. To promote cavities, the results from this and other studies suggest that managed forests should include more features of natural forests, such as more diverse tree species and within-stand structural variability distribution (tree-level heterogeneity), larger amount of decayed wood, more retention trees and snags and longer rotation periods.
Funder
Stiftelsen Skogssällskapet
University of Eastern Finland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference107 articles.
1. Ahola J (1995) Palokärkikannan tiheys ja ikärakenne (Density and the age structure of the Black Woodpecker in southern Finland). Tringa 23(3b):63–67 (in Finnish with English summary)
2. Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn 5:169–211
3. Aitken KEH, Martin K (2007) The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada. J Ornithol 148:425–434
4. Andersson J, Domingo Gómez E, Michon S, Roberge J-M (2018) Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scand J for Res 33:233–244
5. Angelstam P, Mikusiński G (1994) Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest—a review. Ann Zool Fennici 31(1), 157–172. Biodiversity in the Fennoscandian boreal forests: natural variation and its management
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献