Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Andersson, C., & Kazemian, L. (2017). Reliability and validity of cross-national homicide data: A comparison of UN and WHO data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(4), 287–302.
2. Baumer, E. P., & Gustafson, R. (2007). Social organization and instrumental crime: Assessing the empirical validity of classic and contemporary anomie theories. Criminology, 45(3), 617–663.
3. Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2017). An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 30–47.
4. Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. (2013). Are Hofstede’s culture dimensions stable over time? A generational cohort analysis. Mimeo.
5. Bjerregaard, B., & Cochran, J. K. (2008). Cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: Do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime? Western Criminology Review, 9, 31–48.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献