Online Prosumers and Penal Policy Formation in an Age of Digital Polarization and Populism: An Exploratory Study

Author:

Lavorgna AnitaORCID,Corda AlessandroORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores the influence of right-wing social media users on penal policy formation processes. Through a passive digital ethnography approach, the study examines online debates preceding and following recent legislative interventions adopted in Italy by the new right-wing government in power since late 2022, namely the criminalization of unauthorized rave parties and the punitive approach to migration management. The article discusses the role of social media users as prosumers, who both consume and produce content, and shows how social media platforms amplify political polarization by promoting selective exposure to like-minded viewpoints and facilitating the spread of divisive content. It also showcases how prosumers contribute to the propagation of punitive narratives and engage in direct interactions with populist leaders through social media platforms. Conversely, political leaders—specifically Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in this case study—use these platforms to disseminate their narratives and create support for their penal policies, employing fear-mongering tactics and simplistic messaging. Our findings suggest that, while social media platforms have transformed political discourse, in the Italian scenario their direct influence on penal policy making from the ground-up remains limited. Instead, traditional top-down channels continue to dominate the process of penal policy formation.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference107 articles.

1. Aguerri, J. C., Miró-Llinares, F., & Vila-Viñas, D. (2022). When social media feeds classic punitivism on media: The coverage of the glorification of terrorism on XXI. Criminology & Criminal Justice, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221133467

2. Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potential and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5. Available at: https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610

3. Arbatli, E., & Rosenberg, D. (2021). United we stand, divided we rule: How political polarization erodes democracy. Democratization, 28(2), 285–307.

4. ASGI (Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione) (2023). Una prima lettura di ASGI del Decreto Legge 1/2023 convertito in Legge. Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione. Available at: https://www.asgi.it/notizie/decreto-legge-1-2023/.

5. Ash, E., Galletta, S., Pinna, M., & Warshaw, C. (2021). The effect of Fox News channel on U.S. elections: 2000–2020. Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/484661.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3