Abstract
AbstractMeasuring, analyzing, and evaluating social, environmental, and economic impact is crucial to aligning the sustainable development strategies of international organizations, governments, and businesses. In this sense, society has been a determining factor exerting pressure for urgent solutions. The main objective of this paper is to provide an exhaustive analysis of the literature about the tools for measuring social impact and their evolution over the last 50 years. The search was conducted in the main academic databases (Scopus and Web of Science), where 924 articles were found from 1969 to 2020 related to the topic. The results of the quantitative analysis show that 71% of the publications were in the last ten years and the most productive countries were the USA and the United Kingdom. The relational analysis identifies 4 large clusters that fragment the literature into different subfields. The most used keywords are linked to the term "Social" in measurement methods, new concepts, and participants. This article contributes to the literature by giving the researcher an insight into the current state of art, trends, categories within the field, and future lines of research.
Funder
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference87 articles.
1. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002
2. Alireza, A. F. F., Rashidi, T. H., Akbarnezhad, A., & Waller, S. T. (2017). BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 24(4), 668–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2015-0193
3. Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Impact measurement and non-profit organisations: compliance, resistance, and promotion. Voluntas, 25(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6
4. Aturupane, H., Glewwe, P., & Isenman, P. (1994). Poverty, human development, and growth: an emerging consensus? American Economic Review, 84(2), 244–249.
5. Baker, F., & Intagliata, J. (1982). Quality of life in the evaluation of community support systems. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(82)90059-3
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献