Abstract
AbstractThroughput is a commonly used performance indicator for networks. However, throughput may be considered insignificant if data is outdated or networks become unpredictable or unreliable. Critical services may even prioritize latency, predictability, and reliability at the expense of throughput to avoid detrimental effects on service operation. Latency, predictability, and reliability are distinct qualities realized in real-time systems. Real-time systems often require additional effort using non-standard interfaces, requiring customized software, or providing low throughput figures. This work picks up the challenge and investigates a single-server network function—a building block for end-to-end low-latency network applications. Assessing reliability and quantifying low latency is equally challenging, as sub-microsecond latency and $$1/10^{5}$$
1
/
10
5
loss probability leave little room for error. Both, our measurement and the investigated platforms, rely on Linux running on off-the-shelf components. Our paper provides a comprehensive study on the impact of various components on latency and reliability, such as the central processing unit (CPU), the Linux Kernel, the network card, virtualization features, and the networking application itself. We chose Suricata, an intrusion prevention system (IPS), representing a widely deployed, typical network application as our primary subject of investigation.
Funder
Horizon 2020
Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft und Medien, Energie und Technologie
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Strategy and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Information Systems
Reference53 articles.
1. Gallenmüller, S., Wiedner, F., Naab, J., Carle, G.: Ducked tails: trimming the tail latency of(f) packet processing systems. In: 17th international conference on network and service management, CNSM Izmir, Turkey, October 25–29, IEEE, 2021. https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM52442.2021.9615532
2. Gallenmüller, S., Naab, J., Adam, I., Carle, G.: 5G QoS: Impact of Security Functions on Latency. In: NOMS, IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, April 20–24. IEEE 2020, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS47738.2020.9110422
3. Gallenmüller, S., Naab, J., Adam, I., Carle, G.: 5G URLLC: a case study on low-latency intrusion prevention. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58(10), 35–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2000467
4. NGMN Alliance, 5G E2E Technology to Support Verticals URLLC Requirements, 2019
5. Suricata repository: https://github.com/gallenmu/suricata/tree/dpdk-21.11. Accessed 25 Nov 2022
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Exploring Data Plane Updates on P4 Switches with P4Runtime;Computer Communications;2024-09
2. Quality of Service Performance of Multi-Core Broadband Network Gateways;2024 8th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA);2024-05-21
3. Control Groups Added Latency in NFVs: An Update Needed?;2023 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN);2023-11-07
4. Containing Low Tail-Latencies in Packet Processing Using Lightweight Virtualization;2023 35th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC-35);2023-10-03
5. Keeping up to Date with P4Runtime: An Analysis of Data Plane Updates on P4 Switches;2023 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking);2023-06-12