Abstract
AbstractParty elites selecting candidates are crucial for the composition of parliament. Yet, despite their pivotal position within the party, we know only little about their preferences for potential candidates and how their own backgrounds shape these preferences. This paper presents results from a conjoint experiment carried out with party delegates chosen to select the candidates for five German parties in the run-up to three state elections. Theoretical expectations derived from the principle-agent framework on delegates’ preferences in candidates are evaluated. Analyses show that delegates prefer attributes indicative of quality and socio-demographic similarity in candidates. Additionally, I show that these preferences for candidates differ between inexperienced and experienced delegates, the latter showing a stronger preference for valence attributes in candidates. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of personal attributes of selectors for candidate selection and hold crucial implications for the composition of legislatures and long-term effects on public policy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Asquer, R., Golden, M. A., & Hamel, B. T. (2019). Corruption, party leaders, and candidate selection: Evidence from Italy. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 291–325.
2. Besley, T., Folke, O., Persson, T., & Rickne, J. (2017). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review, 107(8), 2204–2242.
3. Best, H., & Cotta, M. (2000). Parliamentary representative in Europe 1848–2000: Legislative recruitment and careers in eleven European countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bochel, J., & Denver, D. (1983). Candidate selection in the labour party: What the selectors seek. British Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 45–69.
5. Brady, D. W., Han, H., & Pope, J. C. (2007). Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 79–105.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献