Abstract
AbstractWe investigated whether income gaps in voting turnout vary with country-level economic inequality, and whether this pattern differs between wealthier and less-wealthy countries. Moreover, we investigated whether the prevalence of clientelism was the underlying mechanism that accounts for the presumed negative interaction between relative income and economic inequality at lower levels of national wealth per capita. The harmonised PolPart dataset, combining cross-national surveys from 66 countries and 292 country-years, including 510,184 individuals, was analysed using multilevel logistic regression models. We found that the positive effect of relative income on voting was weaker at higher levels of economic inequality, independent of the level of national wealth. Although clientelism partially explains why economic inequality reduces the income gap in voter turnout, it does not do so in the way we expected. It seems to decrease turnout of higher income groups, rather than increase turnout of lower income groups. Importantly, that economic inequality reduces the income gap in voter turnout does not imply that economic inequality is positive for democratic representation, since economic inequality was found to depress the likelihood of voting for all income groups.
Funder
European Research Council
University of Amsterdam
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Amat, F., & Beramendi, P. (2016). Economic and political inequality: The role of political mobilization. CAGE Online Working Paper Series 277, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cge/wacage/277.html.
2. Armingeon, K., & Schädel, L. (2015). Social inequality in political participation: The dark sides of individualisation. West European Politics, 38(1), 1–27.
3. Beramendi, P., & Anderson, C. J. (2008). Income, inequality, and electoral participation. In C. J. Anderson & P. Beramendi (Eds.), Democracy, inequality, and representation. A comparative perspective (pp. 278–311). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425.
5. Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献