Abstract
AbstractAnimals are frequently utilized as a teaching-learning tool in multiple educational settings. It is, therefore, important to understand what students think about this topic, in particular medical and veterinary students as “life caregivers” and competent people for a dynamic and responsible social intervention. In this context, this research aims to characterize and disseminate a set of issues related to animal welfare/wellbeing in higher education in the North of Portugal, particularly as regards the teaching of students of the Integrated Master in Medicine (MIM) and Veterinary Medicine (MIMV). After ethical approval, a survey was delivered on paper to 180 undergraduate MIM (n = 100) and MIMV (n = 80) students. After collecting 139 questionnaires partially or fully completed, with varying response rates for each question, it was concluded that most of the students consider that animal experimentation is ethically acceptable when the benefits balance the harms and assuming that refinement of animal procedures is warranted; they also agree to the establishment, maintenance and performance of animal procedures solely for educational purposes as a way of ensuring optimal acquisition of theoretical knowledge, attitudes and behaviors and technical skills. Nevertheless, it is the responsibility of teachers to explore and implement pedagogical methodologies thar are equally effective but more humane and compassionate towards sentient living beings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference57 articles.
1. Andreoli, L., Vlasblom, R., Drost, R., Meijboom, F. L. B., & Salvatori, D. (2023). Challenging future generations: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes toward the transition to animal-free innovations in education and research. Animals, 13, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030394
2. Baillie, S., Crossan, A., Brewster, S., May, S., & Mellor, D. (2010). Evaluating an automated haptic simulator designed for veterinary students to learn bovine rectal palpation. Simulation in Healthcare, 5(5), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e369bf
3. Balcombe, J. P. (2000). The use of animals in higher education: Problems, alternatives & recommendations. The Humane Society Press.
4. Baldelli, I., Biolatti, B., Santi, P., Murialdo, G., Bassi, A. M., Santori, G., & Ciliberti, R. (2019). Conscientious objection to animal testing: A preliminary survey among italian medical and veterinary students. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 47(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261192919840452
5. Baptista, C. S. (2019). Use of animals in pre-graduate teaching of medicine and veterinary medicine: Ethical, pedagogical and animal welfare considerations. In Dissertation (in Portuguese). Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto.