Comparison of Heads of Research Ethics Committees with Data Protection Officers on Personal Data Protection in Research: A Mixed-Methods Study with Structured Interviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Heads of Research Ethics Committees with Data Protection Officers on Personal Data Protection in Research: A Mixed-Methods Study with Structured Interviews

Published:2024-02-20 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1570-1727
Container-title:Journal of Academic Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Acad Ethics

Author:

Ložnjak Karlo^ORCID,Malešević Anamaria^ORCID,Čargo Marin^ORCID,Mladinić Anamarija,Koporc Zvonimir^ORCID,Puljak Livia^ORCID

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10805-024-09509-8.pdf

Reference20 articles.

1. Chafe, R. (2017). The value of qualitative description in health service and policy research. Health Care Policy, 12(3), 12–18.

2. Clarke, N., Vale, G., Reeves, E. P., Kirwan, M., Smith, D., Farrell, M., Hurl, G., & McElvaney, N. G. (2019). GDPR: An impediment to research? Irish Journal of Medical Science, 188(4), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-01980-2

3. Council of Europe Steering Committee on Bioethics. (2012). Guide for research ethics committee members [Internet]. Available at https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/activities/02_biomedical_research_en/Guide/Guide_EN.pdf

4. Croatian Personal Data Protection Agency. (2022a). The DPO handbook. Guidance for data protection officers in the public and quasi-public sectors on how to ensure compliance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation. [Internet]. Available at https://azop.hr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/the-dpo-_handbook_-t4data.pdf

5. Croatian Personal Data Protection Agency. (2022b). Legal framework. [Internet]. Available at https://azop.hr/legal-framework/