Abstract
AbstractThe relation of social ethics to knowledge production is explored through a study about academic research enquiry on minoritised and racialised populations. Despite social change related to migration and ethnicity being a feature of contemporary Northern Ireland, local dynamics and actors seemed under-studied by its research-intensive ‘anchor universities’. To explore this, a critical discourse analysis of published research outputs (n = 200) and related authors’ narratives (n = 32) are interpreted within this paper through conceptualisations of consciousness. Insiders’ perspectives on the influences and structures of the research journey demonstrate the ways in which research cultures (mis)shape the politics of representation, authorship and ethicality. Societal and political disregard for the new publics, reproduced within universities’ hidden curriculum, has been negotiated and to some extent resisted in the research practices of those marginalised (such as women academics), those entering the system (migrant academics), and those local-born whose referential frames were developed external to local universities. Of concern is that the few research enablers were characterised by techno-rationality and doublespeak, impoverishing the depth of theorisation, complexity and intellectual debate necessary for challenging the existing dysconscious racism and xenophobiaism of the social imaginary.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference111 articles.
1. Allen, K. (2018). Critical Consciousness, Racial Identity, and Appropriated Racial Oppression in Black Emerging Adults [Master of Science, Virginia Commonwealth University]. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5687.
2. Anderson, B., Narum, A., & Wolf, J. L. (2019). Expanding the understanding of the categories of Dysconscious Racism. The Educational Forum, 83(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1505015.
3. Anthias, F. (2013). Moving beyond the janus face of integration and diversity discourses: Towards an intersectional framing. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12001.
4. Arendt, H. (1987). Collective Responsibility. In S. J. J. W. Bernauer (Ed.), Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt (pp. 43–50). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3565-5_3.
5. Aspinall, P. J. (2020). Ethnic/Racial terminology as a form of representation: A critical review of the lexicon of collective and specific terms in Use in Britain. Genealogy, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy4030087.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献