Teaching Scientific Integrity in Academia: What and How Students Want to Learn?
-
Published:2024-03-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1570-1727
-
Container-title:Journal of Academic Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Acad Ethics
Author:
Sira N.ORCID, Decker M., Lemke C., Winkens A., Leicht-Scholten C., Groß D.
Abstract
AbstractTraining in scientific integrity continues to be an important topic in universities and other research institutions. Its main goal is to prevent scientific misconduct and promote good scientific practice. However, there is still no consensus on how scientific integrity should be taught. Moreover, the perspective of those who receive such training is often underrepresented. Yet it is precisely their interests and needs that must be considered when developing educational programs. Against this backdrop, we conducted a mixed-methods study with the goal of capturing students’ perspectives on the teaching of scientific integrity. Using our online Scientific Integrity course, we explore what specific aspects of digital teaching on scientific integrity are valued, and explore other topics of interest from students’ perspectives on scientific integrity. The article presents (1) students’ self-assessment before (Q1) and after (Q2) taking the online Scientific Integrity course at the RWTH Aachen University in Germany (2) students’ feedback on the course format, video, exam, organization, and support (Q2) (3) a list of other topics of interest in the area of scientific integrity (Q2). The research outcomes demonstrate an improvement in the study participants’ self-assessment after following the online course and there is a general satisfaction among the students in regard to the course digital format and its components although a desire to have more exchange and discussion was expressed. Further topics of interest in the area of scientific integrity that study participants would like to learn about have a practical appeal and among others include research pressure, examples of applications, preventive measures, theory of science, citation rules, funding of university research. Although the results relate to our course, they provide insight into students’ perspectives on online teaching of scientific integrity. Thus, they may be helpful to higher education institutions developing online courses on scientific integrity that are tailored to university students.
Funder
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 19(5), 379–402. 2. Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2010). Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 85(3), 519. 3. Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621. 4. Bero, B., & Kuhlman, A. (2011). Teaching ethics to engineers: Ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 597–605. 5. Brkic, S., Bogdanovic, G., Vuckovic-Dekic, L., Gavrilovic, D., & Kezic, I. (2012). Science ethics education: Effects of a short lecture on plagiarism on the knowledge of young medical researchers. Journal of B U ON: Official Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology, 17(3), 570–574.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|