Abstract
AbstractHumans and gods alike have since the dawn of time created objects in their own image. From clay figures and wooden toys—some granted life in myths and movies but also dead representations of their creators—to modern-day robots that mimic their creators in more than appearance. These objects tell the story of how we perceive ourselves, and in this article, I examine how they also change us. Robotomorphy describes what occurs when we project the characteristics and capabilities of robots onto ourselves, to make sense of the complicated and mysterious beings that we are. Machines are, after all, relatively comprehensible and help dispel the discomfort associated with complex human concepts such as consciousness, free will, the soul, etc. I then argue that using robots as the mirror image by which we understand ourselves entails an unfortunate reductionism. When robots become the blueprint for humanity, they simultaneously become benchmarks and ideals to live up to, and suddenly the things we make are no longer representations of ourselves, but we of them. This gives rise to a recursive process in which the mirror mirrors itself and influences both the trajectory for machine development and human self-perception.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Hobbes, T.: Leviathan, p. 1651. Basil Blackwell, London (1946)
2. Haraway, D.Steven Seidman(eds): A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In: The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 82–115 (1994)
3. Sætra, H.S.: The ghost in the machine. Human Arenas 2(1), 60–78 (2019)
4. Hayles, N.K.: Unfinished work: From cyborg to cognisphere. Theory Cult. Soc. 23(7–8), 159–166 (2006)
5. Culkin, J.M.: A schoolman's guide to Marshall McLuhan. Sat. Rev. Ed. (1967)
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献