Abstract
AbstractChatGPT-3, based on a large language model created by OpenAI, capable of generating human-like text, has been open to the public since November 2022. Since 2023, ChatGPT-3 has become a much-discussed educational writing tool. We elaborate on what we mean by referring to ChatGPT-3 as an educational assistant and define moral hazard. Then, we put this writing tool, as an extension of human capabilities, in a historical perspective with an analysis of Plato’s critical stance on writing in Phaedrus. After having analysed ChatGPT-3’s current representations in the media and academia, we ask ChatGPT-3 whether its writing tool should be considered an educational assistant or a moral hazard and if it could reflect on the similarity, if any, between Plato’s critical stance and ChatGPT-3 as a writing tool and comment on ChatGPT-3’s answers. Finally, we compare these to Plato’s main arguments with regard to writing and draw a number of conclusions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Alouani, N.: Why you’re the biggest loser in the AI wars. Geek Culture. https://medium.com/geekculture/why-youre-the-biggest-loser-in-the-ai-wars-62824a5f1786 (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023
2. Alkaissi, H., McFarlane, S.I.: Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus 15(2). https://www.cureus.com/articles/138667-artificial-hallucinations-in-chatgpt-implications-in-scientific-writing (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023
3. Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S.: On the dangers of stochastic parrots. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 610–623, ACM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
4. Bent, M., Stubbings R.: The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: core model for higher education. SCONUL. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf (2011). Accessed 16 June 2023
5. Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., Ziefle, M.: What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—a criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Front. Comput. Sci. 5(111), 3903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903