Against the opacity, and for a qualitative understanding, of artificially intelligent technologies

Author:

Khalili MahdiORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims, first, to argue against using opaque AI technologies in decision making processes, and second to suggest that we need to possess a qualitative form of understanding about them. It first argues that opaque artificially intelligent technologies are suitable for users who remain indifferent to the understanding of decisions made by means of these technologies. According to virtue ethics, this implies that these technologies are not well-suited for those who care about realizing their moral capacity. The paper then draws on discussions on scientific understanding to suggest that an AI technology becomes understandable to its users when they are provided with a qualitative account of the consequences of using it. As a result, explainable AI methods can render an AI technology understandable to its users by presenting the qualitative implications of employing the technology for their lives.

Funder

University of Graz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference25 articles.

1. Burrell, J.: How the machine thinks: understanding opacity in machine learning systems. Big Data Soc. 3(1), 1–12 (2016)

2. Müller, V. C.: Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/ethics-ai/ (2021a).

3. Müller, V. C.: Deep opacity undermines data protection and explainable artificial intelligence. In AISB 2021 Symposium Proceedings: Overcoming Opacity in Machine Learning, 18–21 (2021b)

4. Beisbart, C., Räz, T.: Philosophy of science at sea: clarifying the interpretability of machine learning. Philosophy Compass (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12830

5. Durán, J.M., Sand, M., Jongsma, K.: The ethics and epistemology of explanatory AI in medicine and healthcare. Ethics Inf. Technol. 24, 42 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09666-7

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. GLOR-FLEX: Local to Global Rule-Based EXplanations for Federated Learning;2024 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE);2024-06-30

2. Promising the future, encoding the past: AI hype and public media imagery;AI and Ethics;2024-04-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3