Ensuring fundamental rights compliance and trustworthiness of law enforcement AI systems: the ALIGNER Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment

Author:

Casaburo DonatellaORCID,Marsh IrinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractArtificial intelligence systems can expand the capabilities and enhance the efficiency of law enforcement agencies preventing, investigating, detecting, and prosecuting criminal offences in the European Union. At the same time, the deployment of artificial intelligence in the security domain often raises numerous legal and ethical concerns. The ALIGNER Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment is an operational tool, rooted in fundamental rights and in the principles of AI ethics, ready to be integrated in the AI governance measures of European law enforcement agencies to inform their decision-making processes and ensure compliance with the recently adopted Artificial Intelligence Act. This paper first introduces the main tensions between law enforcement AI and fundamental rights, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; then, it gives an overview of the main developments and best practices in AI governance and their relationship with fundamental rights as well as AI ethics; and finally, it describes the structure of the ALIGNER Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment.

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. Akhgar, B., Bayerl, P.S., Bailey, K., Dennis, R., Gibson, H., Heyes, S., Lyle, A., Raven, A., Sampson, F.: Accountability Principles for Artificial Intelligence (AP4AI) in the Internal Security Domain. (2022). https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Accountability_Principles_for_Artificial_Intelligence_AP4AI_in_the_Internet_Security_Domain.pdf Accessed 20 May 2024

2. Casaburo, D., Marsh, I.: ALIGNER D4.2: Methods and guidelines for ethical & law assessment. (2023). https://aligner-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/ALIGNER-D4.2-Methods-and-guidelines-for-ethical-law-assessment-v20230324-FINAL.pdf Accessed 20 February 2024

3. CEN-CENELEC JTC 21: Business Plan for JTC 21. (2022). https://standards.cencenelec.eu/BPCEN/2916257.pdf Accessed 29 July 2024

4. Court of Justice of the European Union: Judgement of the Court (Grand Chamber) in Joined Cases C-293 and C-594/12. Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kärntner Landesregierung and Others. (2014). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62012CJ0293 Accessed 19 January 2024

5. Court of Justice of the European Union: Judgement of the Court (Third Chamber) in Case C-21/10. Károly Nagy v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal. (2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62010CJ0021 Accessed 23 January 2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3