Analytical modelling and UK Government policy

Author:

Oldfield MarieORCID,Haig EllaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the last decade, the UK Government has attempted to implement improved processes and procedures in modelling and analysis in response to the Laidlaw report of 2012 and the Macpherson review of 2013. The Laidlaw report was commissioned after failings during the Intercity West Coast Rail (ICWC) Franchise procurement exercise by the Department for Transport (DfT) that led to a legal challenge of the analytical models used within the exercise. The Macpherson review looked into the quality assurance of Government analytical models in the context of the experience with the Intercity West Coast franchise competition. This paper examines what progress has been made in the 8 years since the Laidlaw report in model building and best practise in government and proposes several recommendations for ways forward. This paper also discusses the Lords Science and Technology Committees of June 2020 that analysed the failings in the modelling of COVID. Despite going on to influence policy, many of the same issues raised within the Laidlaw and Macpherson Reports were also present in the Lords Science and Technology Committee enquiry. We examine the technical and organisational challenges to progress in this area and make recommendations for a way forward.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. Macpherson.: Review of quality assurance of government analytical models. [Online] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-quality-assurance-of-government-models (2013). Accessed 20 Mar 2021

2. Lords: Lords Select Committee on Science & Technology. [Online] https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/193/science-and-technology-committee-lords (2020). Accessed 12 Apr 2021

3. Mashelkar, R.A.: Impact of science, technology and innovation on the economic and political power. AI & Soc. 32, 243–251 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0639-y

4. House of Commons: Committee of Public Accounts. [Online] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubacc/813/813.pdf (2012). Accessed 20 May 2021

5. House of Commons: Committee of Public Accounts. [Online] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmpubacc/390/39003.htm (2010). Accessed 25 May 2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3