Abstract
AbstractThe prospect of the use of Large Language Models, like ChatGPT, in work environments raises important questions regarding both the potential for a dramatic change in the quality of jobs and the risk of unemployment. The answers to these questions, but, also, the posing of questions to be answered, may involve the use of ChatGPT. This, in turn, may give rise to a series of ethical considerations. The article seeks to identify such considerations by presenting a research on a questionnaire that was developed by means of ChatGPT before it was answered, first, by a group of humans (H) and, then, through the use of a machine (M), ChatGPT. The language model was actually used to respond to the questionnaire twice. First, based on its data (M1), and, second, based on it being asked to imitate a human (M2). Based on the significant differences between the H and M answers, and, further, on the noticeable differences occurring within the M answers (the differences between the M1 and M2 answers), the article concludes by registering a cluster of three ethical considerations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference35 articles.
1. Tympas, A.: Calculation and computation in the pre-electronic era. Springer, London (2017)
2. Simos, M., Konstantis, K., Sakalis, K., Tympas, A.: “AI can be analogous to steam power” or from the “post-industrial society” to the “fourth industrial revolution”: an intellectual history of artificial intelligence. ICON 27(1), 97–116 (2022)
3. Nyholm, S.: This is technology ethics. In: Hales, S.D. (ed.) An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey (2023)
4. Hare, S.: Technology Is Not Neutral: A Short Guide to Technology Ethics. London Publishing Partnership, London (2022)
5. Coeckelbergh, M.: AI Ethics. The MIT Press, Massachusetts (2020)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献