Abstract
AbstractArtificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in manufacturing to automate tasks and process data, leading to what has been termed Industry. 4.0. However, as we move towards Industry 5.0, there is a need to incorporate societal and human-centric dimensions into the development and deployment of AI software artefacts. This requires blending ethical considerations with existing practices and standards. To address this need, the TAI-PRM framework has been developed. It builds upon established methods, such as Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and the Industrial ISO 31000, to manage risks associated with AI artefacts in the manufacturing sector. The framework identifies ethical considerations as hazards that can impact system processes and sustainability and provides tools and metrics to manage these risks. To validate the framework, it was applied in an EU project for Digital Twins on AI for manufacturing. The results showed that TAI-PRM can effectively identify and track different failure modes associated with AI artefacts and help users to manage ethical risks associated with their deployment. By incorporating ethical considerations into risk management processes, the framework enables the developing and deploying trustworthy AI in the manufacturing sector.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
University College Cork
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Accenture. Big success with big data—executive summary. 2012. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/%5C_acnmedia/accenture/conversion-assets/dotcom/documents/global/pdf/industries%5C_14/accenture-big-data-pov.pdf%7D. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
2. ASSISTANT. Assistant project – Learning and robust decision support sytem for agile manufacturing environnements. https://assistant-project.eu/. Accessed 04 Jun 2022
3. Bartneck, C., et al.: An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer Nature (2021)
4. Bednar, P.M., Welch, C.: Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Inform. Syst. Front. 22(2), 281–298 (2020)
5. Bedué, P., Fritzsche, A.: Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption. J. Enterp. Inform. Manag. 35, 530–549 (2021)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Project Management Competencies in AI-Driven Environments: A Qualitative Assessment;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-05-04