Moral transparency of and concerning algorithmic tools

Author:

Hayes PaulORCID,van de Poel Ibo,Steen Marc

Abstract

AbstractAlgorithms and AI tools are becoming increasingly influential artefacts in commercial and governance contexts. Algorithms and AI tools are not value neutral; to some extent they must be rendered knowable and known as objects, and in their implementation and deployment, to see clearly and understand their implications for moral values, and what actions can be undertaken to optimise them in their design and use towards ethical goals, or whether they are even suitable for particular goals. Transparency is a term with variable uses and interpretations, a problem which can challenge its use in design and policy. Here, we attempt to further clarify transparency. We argue that transparency is the state of affairs that obtains when relevant and understandable information about some X is available and accessible to some target audience (A), so that this information is sufficient for A for the purpose (P). Moreover, we connect this conceptualisation with transparency’s moral value, where P is to provide an account about X’s supportive or conflicting relationship with relevant values and goals. Such teleological ends in our context here can be the ability to account for the degree to which an algorithm, process or organisation respects certain values and is conducive to (social) goals.

Funder

nwo

Technological University Dublin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference70 articles.

1. Louridas, P.: Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (2020)

2. Angius, N., Primiero, G., Turner, R.: The philosophy of computer science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2021). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/computer-science/. Accessed 9 May 2021

3. Alpaydin, E.: Machine learning: the new AI. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

4. Coeckelbergh, M.: AI Ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2020)

5. Hälterlein, J.: Epistemologies of predictive policing: Mathematical social science, social physics and machine learning. Big Data Soc. 8(1), 20539517211003120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211003118

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3