On singularity and the Stoics: why Stoicism offers a valuable approach to navigating the risks of AI (Artificial Intelligence)

Author:

Bolaños Guerra BernardoORCID,Morton Gutierrez Jorge LuisORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe potential benefits and risks of artificial intelligence technologies have sparked a wide-ranging debate in both academic and public circles. On one hand, there is an urgent call to address the immediate and avoidable challenges associated with these tools, such as accountability, privacy, bias, understandability, and transparency; on the other hand, prominent figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Elon Musk have voiced concerns over the potential rise of Super Artificial Intelligence, whose singularity could pose an existential threat to humanity. Coordinating the efforts of thousands of decentralized entities to prevent such a hypothetical event may seem insurmountable in our intricate and multipolar world. Thus, drawing from both perspectives, this work suggests employing the tools and framework of Stoic philosophy, particularly the concept of the dichotomy of control—focusing on what is within our power. This Stoic principle offers a practical and epistemological approach to managing the complexities of AI, and it encourages individuals to organize their efforts around what they can influence while adapting to the constraints of external factors. Within this framework, the essay found that Stoic wisdom is essential for assessing risks, courage is necessary to face contemporary challenges, and temperance and tranquility are indispensable; and these lessons can inform ongoing public and academic discourse, aiding in the development of more effective policy proposals for aligning Narrow AI and General AI with human values.

Funder

Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference59 articles.

1. AI Act.: Shaping Europe’s digital future (2024). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai. Accessed July 2024

2. Andrade, R.: Problemas filosóficos de la inteligencia artificial general: ontología, conflictos ético-políticos y astrobiología. Argumentos de razón técnica 26, 275–302 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12795/Argumentos/2023.i26.10

3. Aljaber, S., et al.: International journal of engineering research and applications.** *International journal of engineering research and applications*, *12*(12), 52–57 (2022). Retrieved from https://www.ijera.com/papers/vol12no12/G12125257.pdf. Accessed July 2024

4. Aničin, L., Stojmenović, M.: Bias analysis in stable diffusion and midjourney models. In: Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering, pp. 378–388. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35081-8_32

5. Blackman, R.: Ethical machines: Your concise guide to totally unbiased, transparent, and respectful AI. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2022)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3